Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Info response

of 5

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

   8. Provide a revised plan detailing a compliant rear setback.

The proposal requires a setback variation to the eastern rear boundary and therefore
assessed against PO9 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code which is provided below.
The site has frontage to public open space land and therefore and as per AO9.2, setbacks
to the eastern rear boundary are 1.5m (lower floor) and 2.0m (upper floor).

PO9
Buildings and structures are designed and sited to:
    (a) provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site and adjoining premises,
        including provision of visual and acoustic privacy and access to sunlight;
    (b) not unreasonably obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or habitable
        areas of adjoining premises;
    (c) provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;
    (d) preserve existing vegetation that will help buffer development;
    (e) allow for space and landscaping to be provided between buildings including adequate area
        at ground level for landscaping with trees, shrubs and outdoor living;
    (f) be consistent with the predominant character of the streetscape; and
    (g) protect the natural character and avoid adverse impacts on ecologically important
        areas such as national parks, waterways and wetlands.

It is considered the proposal complies with PO9 for the following reasons.

   •   The setback encroachment is limited to an eave of the upper-level balcony.
   •   The setbacks are consistent to that of adjoining dwellings (north and south).
   •   The wall of the dwelling achieves a 4.0m setback and therefore provides an
       adequate distance to dwellings further west.
   •   The encroachment would not result in any appearance of bulk or visual dominance.
   •   The encroachment is limited to the unenclosed upper-level deck.

The images below show the existing Steven Kidd designed house with the first storey
balcony setback 1.5m from the eastern reserve. The Nearmap photo also demonstrates
the larger setback to adjoining houses downhill in the Beach Houses estate which face
east away from the property.




                                                                                  Page 4 of 5
Log in to download the original file

Info response.pdf · 1.2 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.