Original source · versioned page text
2016-08-09 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (15.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 AUGUST 2016
infrastructure provisions for development but also requires Local
Governments to have a new LGIP completed under new statutory
guideline requirements.
The LGIP Statutory Guideline 03/14 has now reintroduced all the former
PIP with ICS requirements that were previously discarded in the 2011
amendments through a Schedule of Works Model (SOW) but without any
logical reason or purpose for doing so. For example, it has reintroduced
full costing of both existing and future infrastructure along with allocating
demands on a per catchment basis for each trunk network that will
provide a cost rate per demand unit per catchment per network etc
identical to what the former ICS did. However, the infrastructure charges
to be issued are no longer determined in this way but instead continue to
be governed by the State Planning Regulatory Provision (adopted
charges) with capped maximums.
Also reintroduced are 3rd party reviews of draft LGIPs by an appointed
reviewer that must now also be engaged and paid for by Local
Government prior to State reviews under a drawn out time consuming
statutory process under Statutory Guideline 04/14. This issue has
previously been raised under the previous motion no 28 at the 118 th
LGAQ Annual Conference in 2014 but unfortunately has not instigated
any corrective actions by the State Government to date.
There clearly is no longer any need for these overly burdensome
requirements for costing of existing infrastructure, demand catchment
allocation and multiple reviews by different parties other than directly by
the local government itself. Furthermore, it also serves no purpose for the
development industry having had all their previous issues addressed via
the legislative tools regarding the level of charges, infrastructure offset,
revaluing and conversion provisions.
Therefore, much of the work required to be undertaken to satisfy the
Statutory Guidelines is now a complete waste of valuable time and
resources and places a completely unnecessary administrative and cost
burden on Local Governments and their communities for no real purpose
or tangible benefit.
The historical miniscule results over the last 20 years of numerous
infrastructure planning and charging reform is sufficient evidence that the
past and current framework is completely unreasonable and unworkable.
The LGIP requirements and whole process needs to be greatly improved
to become fit for purpose, easily attainable and manageable by Local
Government under a system that is simple, straight forward, not overly
bureaucratic and easily updatable. For example, enabling LGIP details to
remain in “charges resolutions” or simply apply the interim LGIP
amendment process (i.e. limited to Local Government review and Public
consultation) for all LGIP requirements would easily achieve this as has
already been clearly and satisfactorily demonstrated. In contrast, the new
LGIP requirements under the new Statutory Guidelines have nil results
to show since its introduction over two years ago.
The new Planning Act 2016 is due to commence next year and a draft
Interim Minister’s Guidelines and Rules document has just been released
on the Departments website. At this time, a full review of this new
Page 29 of 119
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.