Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

AC1345BFIRE precinct F_FINAL

Attached to the e-mail 132005.1133.5 - Bushfire Management Plan - Noosa Springs Precinct F - Email 3 of 3.

of 42

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (16.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

                                                  -9-


5.0    FIELD BUSHFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT

       5.1        Methodology

       Methodology was generally based on established best practice Bushfire Management
       Guidelines.

       5.2        Site Assessment

       Duke Environmental performed a Site Assessment on 19 October 2015 for
       approximately two (2) hours over the site and adjoining Precinct E2 (Lot 6).
       Methodology employed was aimed at providing a field based assessment of the site in
       terms of bushfire hazard, relevant to the proposal. The site was assessed, generally
       against the following criteria:

                 Estimated Fuel Load (t/ha);
                 Slope;
                 Aspect; and
                 Vegetation.

                  5.2.1    Estimated Fuel Load (t/ha)

                  Fuel loads were estimated for the various vegetation communities observed
                  on the site and the adjoining site to the east following site inspection. Potential
                  fuel loads have been determined in accordance with Table 1 of the State
                  Planning Policy – state interest technical manual, Natural Hazards, Risk and
                  Resilience, A “fit for purpose” approach in undertaking natural hazard studies
                  and risk assessments

                                                      Table 5.1
                                                Estimated Fuel Loads
                          VHC             VHC Description                  Potential Fuel Load (t/ha)

                           4             Heath communities                            27

                           6           Cypress and Casuarina                          20

                           7          Open forest/woodlands –                         19
                                              grassy

                  * Refer Section 6.1 for fuel hazard assessment details


                  5.2.2    Slope

                  The site assessment confirms the general details of the desktop assessment
                  regarding slope. The site was observed with topography generally analogous
                  with Undulating (>5% to 10%) to Rolling Hills (>10% to 20%), with the
                  exception of the steep sand slope central to the site which is devoid of
                  vegetation.

                  5.2.3    Aspect

                  Site assessment confirms that the building envelope is characterised by a
                  westerly aspect.



AC1345BFIRE                                      Rev. 1
August 2016
JS/js
Log in to download the original file

AC1345BFIRE precinct F_FINAL.pdf · 16.4 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.