Council archive · source document
240920 - 33 Ross Crescent RFI Response · MCU24/0094
DEVELOPMENT ON SLOPING SITES
RESPONSE | PO20
Performance Outcome Summary:
The proposal satisfies P020(a) by reducing bulk rather than
adding it to the satisfaction of A020.2(a). See drawing
[SD110.01] for further information.
The proposal satisfies P020(b) by stepping the form down
the slope of the site to minimise cut and fill while remaining
below allowable height limits as demonstrated in Section B
on drawings [SD400.01] & additional drawing [SD110.01]
The proposal satisfies P020(c) by retaining and relocating
natural vegetation that assists in screening and visually
softening the development. See drawing [SD110.02] for
further information.
The proposal satisfies P020(d) by using materials that
reflect colours found within the local geology and
vegetation. The proposal uses earth-toned finishes and
textures that blend in seamlessly with the surrounding
environment.
Additional Architectural Commentary:
The proposed design intentionally incorporates a form that
follows the natural contours of the land. The design of the
home has been crafted to harmonise with the natural
topography of the site. By carefully analysing the
landscape, the proposed development ensures that the
building sits gently within the contours of the land rather
than imposing upon it. The structure of the home has been
positioned to follow the natural slope parallel with the
contours of the land, creating a seamless integration with
the landscape. This approach ensures that the building is
visually subordinate to the natural environment, enhancing
its aesthetic appeal and preserving the scenic qualities of
the area.
The proposed roofs are all designed to be masked by
cascading landscaping elements. This approach
contributes to the overall aesthetic appeal of the
development while complying with regulations and
maintaining a cohesive approach across the home.
The proposal satisfies P020(d) as the selection of the
materials, finishes, and colours for the project has been
guided by a desire to complement and integrate with the
natural setting. The palette of materials reflects the local
geology and vegetation, using earth-toned finishes and
textures that blend with the surrounding environment. The
colours and materials are selected not only for their
aesthetic qualities but also for their ability to harmonise
with the skyline and the landscape. This thoughtful
approach ensures that the residence does not stand out
but rather integrates smoothly into the natural environment.
birds eye view - study 01
DRAWN REV DATE ISSUE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO REV PROJECT NO 0427
33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study SD 110.00 SCALE As
indicated
Sunshine Beach Trust
A3
birds eye view study
RFI schematic design
1:1 @
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
[OCR of page images]
—_- Outcome Summary: \)
The proposal satisfies PO20(a) by reducing bulk rather than
adding it to the satisfaction of A020.2(a). See drawing
[SD110.01] for further information.
The proposal satisfies P020(b) by stepping the form down
the slope of the site to minimise cut and fill while remaining
below allowable height limits as demonstrated in Section B
on drawings [SD400.01] & additional drawing [SD110.01]
The proposal satisfies PO20(c) by retaining and relocating
natural vegetation that assists in screening and visually
softening the development. See drawing [SD110.02] for
further information.
The proposal satisfies PO20(d) by using materials that
reflect colours found within the local geology and
vegetation. The proposal uses earth-toned finishes and
textures that blend in seamlessly with the surrounding
environment.
Additional Architectural Commentary:
The proposed design intentionally incorporates a form that
follows the natural contours of the land. The design of the
home has been crafted to harmonise with the natural
topography of the site. By carefully analysing the
landscape, the proposed development ensures that the
building sits gently within the contours of the land rather
than imposing upon it. The structure of the home has been
positioned to follow the natural slope parallel with the
contours of the land, creating a seamless integration with
the landscape. This approach ensures that the building is
visually subordinate to the natural environment, enhancing
its aesthetic appeal and preserving the scenic qualities of
the area.
The proposed roofs are all designed to be masked by
cascading landscaping elements. This approach
contributes to the overall aesthetic appeal of the
development while complying with regulations and
maintaining a cohesive approach across the home.
The proposal satisfies PO20(d) as the selection of the
materials, finishes, and colours for the project has been
guided by a desire to complement and integrate with the
natural setting. The palette of materials reflects the local
geology and vegetation, using earth-toned finishes and
textures that blend with the surrounding environment. The
colours and materials are selected not only for their
aesthetic qualities but also for their ability to harmonise
with the skyline and the landscape. This thoughtful
approach ensures that the residence does not stand out
iS rather integrates smoothly into the natural environment.
shaun lockyer architects
www.lockyerarchitects.com.au . 07 3257 7288
nominated architect: Shaun Lockyer 3455 QLD . 9377 NSW
DRAWN
REV
DATE
birds eye view - study 01
PROJECT ‘CLIENT
33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family
Sunshine Beach Trust
DRAWING NAME PHASE DwWG NO PROJECTNO 0427
site study SD 110.00 ext iS
indicated
birds eye view study 7 5
RFI schematic design A 3
1:1@
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT ON SLOPING SITES
RESPONSE | PO20
5 6 7 8 9
proposed reduction in bulk apperance (shown red)
PO20 | By establishing the height limitations above
the natural contour the proposed carves out from,
rather than projects into, the allowable envelope.
This reduces the bulk and scale while enabling
amenity by way of external space for residents to
TOW 27.800 enjoy.
The southern elevation for the proposed
rnd01 development remains within the allowable height
limits and at no point does the home exceed
allowable heights. Additionally, roofing the ground
floor with a conventionally pitched roof that
parallels the natural contour not only adds bulk but
it eliminates any opportunity for views and amenity
for the first floor occupants to the east.
TOW 24.300
roof
RL24.100
mts01 con02
3100
bal01 height limit projected (8m) above (ngl)
dashed red
TOW 21.300
first floor
RL21.000
con02
gls01 gls01 gls01
mts01
3500
seat
con02 line of natural ground (ngl)
ground level dashed red
RL17.500
alu01
TOW 16.550
con03
4000
lower ground
RL13.500
DRAWN REV DATE ISSUE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO REV
PROJECT NO 0427
33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study SD 110.01 SCALE As
indicated
southern elevation
Sunshine Beach Trust RFI schematic design
1:1 @ A3
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
[OCR of page images]
a)
DM
~~
8)
DK _2000
‘OW 27.804
fan}
«K 5740
, os
WV i240)
12700
proposed reduction in bulk apperance (shown red)
‘OW 24.301
8500
PO20 | By establishing the height limitations above
the natural contour the proposed carves out from,
rather than projects into, the allowable envelope.
This reduces the bulk and scale while enabling
amenity by way of external space for residents to
enjoy.
The southern elevation for the proposed
development remains within the allowable height
limits and at no point does the home exceed
allowable heights. Additionally, roofing the ground
floor with a conventionally pitched roof that
parallels the natural contour not only adds bulk but
it eliminates any opportunity for views and amenity
for the first floor occupants to the east.
+
100
first floor a,
WV R121.000
height limit projected (8m) above (ngl)
dashed red
i -
y
i
a ?
| ( f
f $2 Tt 7
H ; t
g — t t cK t
a | 7y ~|g
Y XN
Z
ground level
W._ Ru7.500
£ q
9 t 4
g bf 4
g fi
lower ground
W. RL13.500
shaun lockyer architects
www.lockyerarchitects.com.au . 07 3257 7288
nominated architect: Shaun Lockyer 3455 QLD . 9377 NSW
DRAWN REV DATE
ISSUE
PROJECT
33 Ross Crescent,
Sunshine Beach
CLIENT
Ross Crescent Family
Trust
line of natural ground (ngl)
dashed red
DRAWING NAME
site study
southern elevation
RFI
PHASE DWG NO REV
SD 110.01
schematic design
Ror \a 3
FETC)
PROJECTNO 0427
ry
indicated
A3
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
Page 3
DEVELOPMENT ON SLOPING SITES
heavily landscaped edges conceal built form of
RESPONSE | PO20 dwelling replicating the site contours natural
undulations
Additional Architectural Commentary:
The proposed development respects and enhances the natural proposed reduction in bulk apperance
landscape, ensuring a harmonious and sustainable integration with
the surrounding environment. The development showcases
cascading planting across the facades and outdoor areas that will
gradually blend in seamlessly with the surrounding landscape,
effectively concealing any built form. In particular, the more
elevated corner of the eastern facade will be extensively
landscaped, ensuring it becomes fully integrated into the
surrounding environment covering all built elements.
Perspective view taken from within heavily vegetated
area within site boundary - note*- Large scale existing
trees and relocated trees shown within artistic
impression.
ARTISTIC IMPRESSIONS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY - REFER DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN REV DATE ISSUE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO REV
PROJECT NO 0427
33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study SD 110.02 SCALE 1:1
southern elevation
Sunshine Beach Trust RFI schematic design
1:1 @ A3
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
[OCR of page images]
heavily landscaped edges conceal built form of
pe nn nn ns nn nn nn nn nnn nnn ae pea nn--- dwelling replicating the site contours natural = )------------ a
, Vy \
'
i \ undulations
Additional Architectural Commentary:
The proposed development respects and enhances the natural
landscape, ensuring a harmonious and sustainable integration with
the surrounding environment. The development showcases
cascading planting across the facades and outdoor areas that will
gradually blend in seamlessly with the surrounding landscape,
effectively concealing any built form. In particular, the more
elevated corner of the eastern facade will be extensively
landscaped, ensuring it becomes fully integrated into the
surrounding environment covering all built elements.
proposed reduction in bulk apperance
Perspective view taken from within heavily vegetated \
area within site boundary - note*- Large scale existing
trees and relocated trees shown within artistic
impression.
DRAWN REV DATE ISSUE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO REV Prion
shaunlockyerarchitects 33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study i) 110.02 Ee
www.lockyerarchitects.com.au . 07 3257 7288 Sunshine Beach Trust southern elevation ;
nominated architect: Shaun Lockyer 3455 QLD . 9377 NSW RFI schematic design 11@ A3
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT 35m wide eastern frontage
setback ~90m from visible height on beach
RESPONSE | PO8
The proposal satisfies PO8(a) as the proposed
development and is designed to be compatible with the
scale of surrounding development and the unique
highly d
circumstances of the site. Given the expansive nature of
the lot, the size of the dwelling is appropriate and maintains
ense exi
a harmonious relationship with neighboring properties.
sting ve
The proposal satisfies PO8(b) as the development
Alison Park's heavily vegetated area
prioritises a low site impact to maximise the retention of
existing site characteristics, including native vegetation
getation
and natural landforms. The careful placement of the
building minimises disruption to the landscape and allows 1
buffer
for the preservation of important ecological features. The
proposed development preserves the existing vegetation
and relocates where possible. Identified trees have been
retained and indigenous planting species remain in place 22m vegetation buffer
that contribute to screening and visually softening the 2
development. These natural elements have been retained
and or relocated within the site to provide natural buffering 3
and enhance the visual continuity between the built
environment and the surrounding landscape.
1) 1.5m wide supporting structural wall (minimal visual impact)
The proposal satisfies PO8(c) by incorporating large areas
of soft landscaping within, ontop and around the dwelling,
2) 18m deck screened below surrounding existing vegetation height not visible from the beach
by promoting a seamless integration with the environment.
The proposal not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of the
surroundings but also supports local biodiversity and 3) 62m property boundary to east
contributes to the overall green space of the area.
The proposal satisfies PO8(d) as the development
incorporates a strategy of stepping down with the natural
slope, thereby minimising the apperance of any bulk form
seen from adjacent properties, roads or other areas in the
vicinity of the site. The developments architectural
features, landscaping, and stepped building heights,
integrates harmoniously with the surrounding environment.
This approach enhances the visual aesthetics of the area
while maintaining a scale that is consistent with
neighboring structures. Overall, the development promotes
a sense of openness and contributes positively to the
character of the neighborhood.
birds eye view - study 02
ARTISTIC IMPRESSIONS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY - REFER DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN REV DATE ISSUE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO REV PROJECT NO 0427
33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study SD 110.03 SCALE As
indicated
Sunshine Beach Trust
A3
birds eye view study
RFI schematic design
1:1 @
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
[OCR of page images]
i: 35m wide eastern frontages
setback ~90m from visible height on beach {Ua
\ EE I aS] ae
(the proposal satisfies PO8(a) as the proposed
development and is designed to be compatible with the
scale of surrounding development and the unique
circumstances of the site. Given the expansive nature of
the lot, the size of the dwelling is appropriate and maintains
a harmonious relationship with neighboring properties.
The proposal satisfies PO8(b) as the development
prioritises a low site impact to maximise the retention of
existing site characteristics, including native vegetation
and natural landforms. The careful placement of the
building minimises disruption to the landscape and allows
for the preservation of important ecological features. The
proposed development preserves the existing vegetation
and relocates where possible. Identified trees have been
retained and indigenous planting species remain in place
that contribute to screening and visually softening the
development. These natural elements have been retained
and or relocated within the site to provide natural buffering
and enhance the visual continuity between the built
environment and the surrounding landscape.
ily vegetated area
Alison Park's he
The proposal satisfies PO8(c) by incorporating large areas
of soft landscaping within, ontop and around the dwelling,
by promoting a seamless integration with the environment.
The proposal not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of the
surroundings but also supports local biodiversity and
contributes to the overall green space of the area.
The proposal satisfies PO8(d) as the development
incorporates a strategy of stepping down with the natural
slope, thereby minimising the apperance of any bulk form
seen from adjacent properties, roads or other areas in the
vicinity of the site. The developments architectural
features, landscaping, and stepped building heights,
integrates harmoniously with the surrounding environment.
This approach enhances the visual aesthetics of the area
while maintaining a scale that is consistent with
neighboring structures. Overall, the development promotes
a sense of openness and contributes positively to the
\\ character of the neighborhood.
birds eye view - study 02
ARTISTIC IMPRESSIONS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY - REFER DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REV DATE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO Etlitantemmerers
shaun lockyer architects 33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study SD 110.03 SCALE cS
indicated
www.lockyerarchitects.com.au . 07 3257 7288 Sunshine Beach Trust birds eye view study hematic desi
nominated architect: Shaun Lockyer 2455 QLD . 9377 NSW RFI senematic desien 1:1@ A3
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
Used in these records
240920 - 33 Ross Crescent RFI Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.