Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

Planning Report Dec 2019 (002)

of 16

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                       proposal report




4.0 Planning assessment
4.1 Minor Change
This application seeks to change TPC2409 (51991.65.02) (Shop and Additional Dwelling unit) to
enable an extension to the existing restaurant approved under 51991.65.02 to temporarily utilise the
upstairs area for dining purposes until the unit is ready for construction. An assessment of the
proposed changes against the provisions of the Planning Act 2016 relating to what defines a minor
change is detailed below. The Planning Act 2016 states that a minor change:

     b) for a development approval, is a change to the approval that —
      (i) would not result in a substantially different development; and

     The proposed works are considered to comply with the provisions relating to a minor change
     and are not considered to be a substantially different development as detailed by the
     Development Assessment Rules which include:

        (a) involves a new use;

              No new use proposed as site approved for units and restaurant.

        (b) results in the application applying to a new parcel of land;

              No new parcel of land to be utilised.

        (c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance;

              Building form not significantly altered as works will be located in existing structures
              currently on the roof level Building height and building form are consistent with the
              existing development on the site.

        (d) changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended;

              The additional dining area will complement the restaurant uses on the site.

        (e) removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development;

              No integral components removed.

        (f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic
        to the site;

              No additional carparking is able to be provided on site. The additional floor area of
              which the restaurant owners advises that only 30m2 is available for seating will not
              significantly impact on traffic flow.

        (g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts;

              Restaurant uses currently exist on the site.

        (h) removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative impact
        of the development; or



             martoo consulting
             town planners + urban designers + development managers                          page 11 of 16
Log in to download the original file

Planning Report Dec 2019 (002).pdf · 1.2 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.