Original source · versioned page text
2022-05-16 GC Agenda - Item 7 - Attachment 1 - Report from Marine Approval Specialists
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Performance outcome Acceptable outcome Applicant response Assessment
standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the
standard mentioned in
paragraph (a);
(c) any other relevant planning
scheme standard that is not
inconsistent with the
standards mentioned in
paragraphs (a) and (b).
Public access – availability
8.1 Prescribed tidal works do not The design and construction of the Complies with Performance The applicant has demonstrated
have a significant adverse effect prescribed tidal works is Outcome 8.1 compliance with PO8.1
on the availability of public consistent with the following The design provides for a The Project does not have a
access to, along or across State standards— minimum distance of 10m significant adverse effect on the
coastal land. (a) subject to paragraph (b), from foreshore access to availability of public access to or
prescribed tidal works do not maintain public use of and along State coastal land, given it is
involve the erection or access to and along state primarily located on the seabed.
placement of any physical coastal land. Refer ICM Where the project interfaces with
barrier preventing existing drawing NROR-2021-00. State coastal land, appropriate
public access to, along or At the Tewantin site (ICM access has been maintained. The key
across State coastal land near drawing NROR-2021-04) location where public safety is a
the works; upstream of the boat concern is the load-out facility and
(b) if a relevant planning scheme ramp, there is an opening appropriate management and
standard is more stringent in the vegetation that separation of project activities from
than the standard mentioned could provide public access ongoing public use has been
in paragraph (a)—the to the structure if considered.
relevant planning scheme desirable. In this location a
standard, to the extent it is wider 4m access gap has
more stringent than the been provided between
standard mentioned in shoreward reef patches to
paragraph (a); facilitate safe access by a
(c) any other relevant planning larger number of persons if
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.