Original source · versioned page text
2022-05-16 GC Agenda - Item 7 - Attachment 1 - Report from Marine Approval Specialists
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Performance outcome Acceptable outcome Applicant response Assessment (d) the protection of any foreshores near the works and the vegetation and marine plants on the foreshores Design, construction and safety—all prescribed tidal works 12.1 Prescribed tidal works are The design and construction of the Alternative Solution for The applicant has demonstrated designed and constructed in a prescribed tidal works is Performance Outcome compliance with PO12.1. The way to ensure they are consistent with the following 12.1. proposed design and construction of structurally sound, having standards— The rock substrate has the Project is in accordance with regard to the following— (a) subject to paragraph (c), each been designed by ICM to relevant engineering standards (a) relevant engineering Australian Standard relevant be structurally sound, which considers their location and standards; to the design or construction having regard to the purpose, being primarily on the (b) the location of the works; of structures, to the extent following: seabed to provide a restoration (c) the purpose for which the requirements stated in the (a) Relevant Australian substrate. works are to be used; Standard apply to the design Standards and (d) the impact of flooding, or construction of prescribed internationally recognised storm tide, overtopping by tidal works; best practice guidelines. waves, projected sea level (b) subject to paragraph (c), the The structure has been rise, tidal influences and projected sea level rise is certified by an RPEQ hydrodynamic forces; factored into the design and engineer. (e) the design life of the works; construction of the prescribed (b) Site-specific design (f) the dead load of the works tidal works; details have been provided and the intended live load (c) if a relevant planning scheme for Phase 1. The detailed for the works; standard is more stringent design of Phase 2 is (g) the impact of hydrostatic than the standard mentioned required to be undertaken pressures on the works; in paragraph (a) or (b)—the by a coastal engineer, (h) the stability of individual relevant planning scheme including consideration of components of the works, standard, to the extent it is site-specific parameters including, for example, more stringent than the and selection of a stabile boulders, concrete blocks standard mentioned in rock grading. Refer ICM or sandbags paragraph (a) or (b).
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.