Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

ASTP-Resp-To-FA · 51988.2764.01

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

also results in an improved situation for the streetscape with the southern portion of the front fence being
removed to ensure that the landscape strip adjacent to the visitor car park is visible from street. Overall, the
revised proposal will result in an improvement to the appearance of the streetscape with a greater extent of
landscapes provided and the removal of the enclosed garage to reduce the appearance of built form when
viewed from the street. The proposal therefore complies with PO12 of the Code by allowing for space and
landscaping to be provided between the buildings and structures onsite and the street.



            ITEM 3
            The submitted documentation does not include a Stormwater Management Plan.

            Information Required
            3. Provide a preliminary Stormwater Management Plan that includes, but not be limited to, details
                 of how rain water on landscaped and impervious areas will be collected and released from the
                 site. The preliminary plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified person.

            Please note that the stormwater drainage system must be a gravity system and pumps are
            not acceptable.

RESPONSE
It is determined that a stormwater management plan is not necessary to be provided on the basis that the
proposed carport seeks to replace the existing garage of the same size. As such, the site cover achieved, being
38%, remains unchanged by the proposal. It is also noted that the size of the impervious hardstand area onsite
will be decreased to enable greater deep planted landscaping extents to be provided. Finally, it is not proposed
to alter the existing levels of the site, with stormwater drainage being in accordance with the existing conditions
of the site.



            ITEM 4 & 6
            The submitted plans do not include sufficient detail on the access driveway and manoeuvring
            areas.

            Information Required
            4. Provide additional detail on the access driveway and manoeuvring areas. The detail must be
                 prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland)
                 and include, but not be limited to:
                     a. levels and grades of the access driveway and manoeuvring areas;
                     b. dimensions of the proposed driveway and manoeuvring;
                     c. a design generally in accordance with RS-049, RS-050 and any associated addendum;
                     d. a longitudinal section extending from the centreline of the formation in Orient Drive to
                          the garage level; and
                     e. demonstrate that a B99 vehicle will not bottom out or scrape while entering/exiting the
                          driveway.

            Provide a Turning Path Plan demonstrating how a B99 vehicle can enter and exit each proposed
            carpark. The plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional
            Engineer of Queensland).


                                                                                                          Page 3 of 4
Our ref: 220325

Used in these records

About this file

File size
484 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

ASTP-Resp-To-FA.pdf · 484 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.