Council archive · source document
Development Application part 6 of 10 Traffic Impact Assessment - MCU13/0092
Very large file (33.9 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
4.5.1 David Low Way I Woodland Drive
The SIDRA analysis of the David Low Way I Woodland Drive intersection was undertaken using the
intersection layout as shown in Figure 2.2. The results of these analyses are attached in Appendix B, and
are surnmarised in Table 4.3.
Table 4.3: DAVID LOW WAY I WOODLAND DRIVE OPERATIONS
"_’<<’i ~
~h’, ’ ;:t, ;;."~~ ,~
$oulh:illavi:flL’oww
~ .T. ’..<’,"~’..., ,. 111’..
..~~~’~:t:;:’;:~~f~ ~~~l’t~: .
.
.
C~~
.
,".,., :!:4!t~, .’
l~s,!=~Q.o ~s"r:?,r~ ’:1f,t.~~p),ighl.rA.l"~ -
-
~!:,., f",r’ ...."r, "!IlI’’’
,..~ .
--"-’~~n~-- .",~".,,~ -’-,;;~ ~JJ’ __~--,rJ} -,
~.o.;v"W~y\"..T~r ~a_T1.d~~f!";’
-
’~Q.4 J;;’.h: Sq ,!b~P~ ,..:
fj :1}.::’,,/;’_
~"j ~" ?’ r~’ -::t= -",l~" 1<1’’’ft-’,;.~%
_~_’~- f;: ".:;t. ~~
.9,jj.,i1 :t?Wr;sI"’Wo.l1d!!mdsD.riv~...L’tl’.rid,Rigb.t’:~’
.
.
.. . ’,’
);,,~~t:!~~);~:;~A\I~:~;l ~~ .
j!5 ~::., ~~~~~~,:;P~~<4’~v.>>:,~ iJhl~~f~~vdJ;;e~,i . .
’_r’0.5’ -,,~ .
So th:"p’,aVid"Low Way’olr~Q~gb and Left ~ ;.,.
r
~ ~ ....01.’ ,_,.. .,... _. ~.., ’___. ’._
;": ’w’
-~
_
IT.
"
::;},,~,- .
-_1::: __.~-Q!m ~ _,-’:~:
1:4 ,i;-
~..
.
’hVY_est: W~n’i~ DrlY5 ~;i:.e!.~d_~ _.ii .
.
~..
~~~. :l’.(,.?I""~~~ )~’t’I’~.-,,~i-"’~
0.7 " outh: DaVldlow.w .
": ;"’~u.~~~.~~.,;;~ .
"l!t,J.7 -...1"l~eE.;~:&.o21a~sB!lys.: l:~t".t:an~)~! t.....
Table 4.3 demonstrates that the David Low Way I Woodland Drive intersection is expected to experience
"excellent" or "very good" operations during the weekday evening and Saturday peak periods. The
addition of the development related traffic is not expected to significantly affect the critical degree of
saturation.
4.5.2 Woodland Drive IRufous Street
The SIDRA analyses performed to quantify the existing and future year (ie 2015 and 2025) peak hour
operations of this intersection were undertaken using the intersection layout as shown in Figure 2.3. The
results of these analyses are summarised in Table 4.4 and presented in Appendix B.
P:12011-12/12.060PEREGIANBEACH SCIREPORTSI12.060PEREGIAN TIA REVISIONADOCX 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application part 6 of 10 Traffic Impact Assessment - MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 33.9 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.