Original source · versioned page text
6.5.22 - Flooding Report 5 may
The original of this document is very large (21.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 21, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
4.3.2.7.
4.3.2.7. Severe Storm Assessment
A severe storm assessment was completed for the 1% (2100) AEP event assuming all of the
stormwater culverts are 100% blocked to ensure the future dwellings within the development
site do not become inundated and no new flow paths are formed that may impact
adjoining properties.
The assessment found that the building envelopes are not impacted by the 100% blocked
scenario with a flood level increase of up to 0.08m noted, which is less than the minimum
0.3m freeboard required. It is also noted that no new flow paths form as a result of the 100%
blocked scenario and adjoining properties are not impacts.
Whilst it is not a design requirement for the 100% blocked scenario to achieve QUDM design
requirements, a comparison against the QUDM road drainage criteria has been made for
some context. In the 100% blocked scenario, the depth of flow exceeds the 0.2m QUDM
depth criteria in the upstream lane (with depths up to 0.25m noted), however, is less than
0.2m on the downstream lane. Flow velocity is up to 1.75m/s. Approximately 80m of the
road has a hazard greater than the 0.3m2/s QUDM hazard criteria (with hazard up to 0.5m2/s
noted).
A flood depth map for this scenario is provided in Appendix I.
4.3.2.8. Flood Risk
This development has been designed to provide flood free access to all lots via the new
internal road in events up to the 10% AEP and will remain trafficable in events up to the 1%
AEP event in accordance with the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (QUDM).
Further consideration of flood risk has been undertaken in events greater than the 1% AEP
event, with assessment of the PMF event taking place. The assessment found that the lots
within the development would become isolated in extreme events such as the PMF, with the
internal access road having flow conditions that would not be trafficable. An assessment was
completed as to the length of time the internal access would be considered not trafficable
(flow depths > 0.2m) along the warning time between the start of the rain event to when the
internal crossing becomes not trafficable. The assessment was completed for the PMF event
for a number of durations and is highlighted below in . From this, it is considered that a site
flood warning system would not be appropriate in this situation due to the short response
times for flood waters to rise. It would be safer outcome for residents to seek refuge within
their houses and communication about a extreme weather system come from Council or
State Disaster Management Services.
This assessment highlights that there would be a limited amount of time to warn / evacuate
residents due to the relatively short amount of time it takes for the internal road to become
inundated in an extreme (i.e PMF) event. This would be typical of all catchments where the
upstream catchment is relatively small. From this, the time of submergence is also relatively
small with times ranging from 2.0 to 8.0 hours depending on the event duration.
From this, it is considered that the provision of suitable flood refuge or evacuation to higher
ground (i.e. to Glenridge Drive) would be the preferred risk management measure as
opposed to evacuating the area to a formal evacuation centre. Each lot is provided with
an 1,100m2 building envelope above the PMF level that would be suitable to act as a flood
refuge until flood waters recede.
The application of a flood refuge is recommended in similar circumstances as means to
address flood risk and potential burden by Gold Coast City Council (GCCC), who have large
amount of flood plain on which developments are managed. The Guideline developed by
GCCC is presented in Appendix J, and in summary states “a shelter-in-place approach
21-0288-FS001-V5 | Flood Investigation | 60 Glenridge Drive, Cooroibah | 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.