Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

16-001014-02A (Ultimate SCMMP)

Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW16/0203 - 4 of 4.

of 192

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (14.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

                  WQCP DESIGN ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST - BASED ON WBD WSUD TECHNICAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
                               WETLAND DESIGN ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Asset I.D.        Central Basin (WQCP)
Wetland           Refer to Operational Works Drawing No. 16-001014-400 Series and latest issue of SWMP Report No. 16-001014-01.
L   ti
Hydraulics:       Design operational flow (m3/s):            5.07         Above design flow (m3/s):                                          5.07
Area:             Catchment Area (ha):                       13.9         Wetland Area (ha):                                                0.194
TREATMENT                                                                                       Y     N   Comment
MUSIC modelling performed?                                                                      Y         Refer to latest issue of SWMP Report No. 16-001014-01.
INLET ZONE                                                                                      Y     N   Comment
Discharge pipe/structure to inlet zone sufficient for maximum design flow?                     N/A        Inlet zone/pond is not applicable as runoff is pretreated by GPT and Bioretention
                                                                                                          Basins with energy dissipaters at outlets into basin
Scour protection provided at inlet for inflow velocities?                                      N/A        Scour Protection provided for inflows into pond.


Configuration of inlet zone (aspect, depth and flows) allows settling of particles             N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above
>125μm?
Bypass weir incorporated into inlet zone?                                                      N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Bypass weir length sufficient to convey 'above design flow' ?                                  N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Bypass weir crest at macrophyte zone top of extended detention depth?                          N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Bypass channel has sufficient capacity to convey 'above design flow'?                          N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Bypass channel has sufficient scour protection for design velocities?                          N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Inlet zone connection to macrophyte zone overflow pit and connection pipe sized to             N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above
convey the design operation flow?
Inlet zone connection to macrophyte zone allows energy dissipation?                            N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Structure from inlet zone to macrophyte zone enables isolation of the macrophyte               N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above
zone for maintenance?
Inlet zone permanent pool level above macrophyte permanent pool level?                         N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Maintenance access allowed for into base of inlet zone?                                        N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Public safety design considerations included in inlet zone design?                             N/A        No Inlet Zone provided, refer to comments above


Where required, gross pollutant protection measures provided on inlet structures               Y          GPT's and upstream Bioretention Basins provided at inflow locations to WQCP
(both inflows and to macrophyte zone)
MACROPHYTE ZONE                                                                                Y      N   Comment


Extended detention depth >0.25m and <0.5m?                                                     Y          Extended Detention Depth = 400mm


Vegetation bands perpendicular to flow path?                                                   N/A        Not Applicable - A WQCP is proposed not a wetland. Furthermore the Pond is not
                                                                                                          required to meet site WQO's.
Appropriate range of macrophyte vegetation (ephemeral, shallow, marsh, deep                    N/A        Not Applicable - A WQCP is proposed not a wetland. Furthermore the Pond is not
marsh)?                                                                                                   required to meet site WQO's.
Sequencing of vegetation bands provides continuous gradient to open water zones?               N/A        Not Applicable - A WQCP is proposed not a wetland. Furthermore the Pond is not
                                                                                                          required to meet site WQO's.
Vegetation appropriate to selected band?                                                       N/A        Not Applicable - A WQCP is proposed not a wetland. Furthermore the Pond is not
                                                                                                          required to meet site WQO's.
Aspect ratio provides hydraulic efficiency =>0.5?                                              N/A        Not Applicable - A WQCP is proposed not a wetland. Furthermore the Pond is not
                                                                                                          required to meet site WQO's.
Velocities from inlet zone <0.05 m/s or scouring protection provided?                          Y          Scour Protection has been sized in accordance with QUDM (2013) specifications


Public safety design considerations included in macrophyte zone (i.e. batter slopes            Y          Refer to Operational Works Drawing No. 16-001014-400 Series. Proposed fencing
less than 5(H):1(V)?                                                                                      surrounding all edges of WQCP, slight grades for safety is also proposed, 2m
                                                                                                          benching around wetland is provided along macrophyte zone (with slopes larger than
                                                                                                          1:8)
Maintenance access provided into areas of the macrophyte zone (especially open                 Y          Access provided to WQCP
water zones)?
Safety audit of publicly accessible areas undertaken?                                          Y          Refer to Operational Works Drawing No. 16-001014-400 Series for safety features
                                                                                                          surrounding WQCP.
Freeboard provided above extended detention depth to define embankments?                       Y          300mm freeboard provided to minimum top of embankment level as per specifications
                                                                                                          provided in the latest issue of the SWMP Report No. 16-001014-01.

OUTLET STRUCTURES                                                                              Y      N   Comment


Riser outlet provided in macrophyte zone?                                                      Y          Refer to the latest issue of the SWMP Report No. 16-001014-01.


Notional detention time of 48-72 hours?                                                        Y          Nominal Detention Time of 55 hrs determined in latest issue of the SWMP Report No.
                                                                                                          16-001014-01.
Orifice configuration allows for a linear storage-discharge relationship for full range of     Y          Nominal Detention Time in the latest issue of the SWMP Report No. 16-001014-01.
the extended detention depth?
Maintenance drain provided?                                                                    Y          Pumping of deep water zones proposed.


Discharge pipe has sufficient capacity to convey maximum of either the maintenance             Y          Riser calculations confirm sufficiency of discharge pipe
drain flows or riser pipe flows with scour protection?
Protection against clogging of orifice provided on outlet structure?                           Y          Refer to Operational Works Drawing No. 16-001014-400 Series for details.


OTHER COMMENTS
Log in to download the original file

16-001014-02A (Ultimate SCMMP).pdf · 14.7 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.