Original source · versioned page text
Minor Change Letter
Notably, the amendment identified in Table A below will be required to be made to the conditions of approval.
Table A: Changes to conditions of approval
Condition Rationale / Comments
▪ The revised 7m buffer maintains the intent of the
condition by providing a landscaped frontage to
Hofmann Drive with local native species. The
Condition 53(a)
revised buffer will continue to achieve the intent of
Local native plant species suitable for the location in
the original condition by providing a landscaped
mulched garden beds within the lots that front Hofmann
edge to Hofmann Drive with local native plant
Drive and the future extension of Hofmann Drive that at 6m
species, while balancing the site’s development
wide to the residential lots 17-19 and 10m wide to the
potential.
remaining lots at the time of sealing the plan of
subdivision, unless otherwise approved by Council as ▪ The change is sought to align the approval with the
part of a subsequent development application over the outcome of discussions and agreement reached
newly created lots. with Council during the Child Care Centre appeal.
Specifically, it was agreed that a 7m wide landscape
buffer is appropriate for Lot 4, in place of the
previously conditioned 10m width.
3.4. Changes to Infrastructure Charges Notice
No changes are proposed to the number of approved lots. As such, it is not anticipated there would be any changes
required to the previous Infrastructure Charges Notice.
4. Assessment Of Minor Change
4.1. Overview
The Planning Act establishes two types of changes to a development approval:
▪ A ‘minor change’ to a development approval: or
▪ An ‘other change’ to a development approval.
For a change application to be considered as a minor change, the change to the development approval must meet the
definition of a ‘minor change’ as set out in Schedule 2 of the Planning Act. See below.
‘A change that⎯
b. for a development approval⎯
i. would not result in substantially different development; and
ii. if a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the
change application is made would not cause⎯
A. the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
B. referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there were no referral
agencies for the development application; or
C. referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or
D. a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to, matters prescribed by
regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the referral agency must have assessed the
application against, or have had regard to, when the application was made; or
E. public notification if public notification was not required for the development application’.
With respect to item (b)(i), Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules provides guidance on the determination of
whether a proposed change does or does not constitute ‘substantially different development’. These provisions are for
www.thereforgroup.com.au Minor Change Application (ROL) | 21-0694P/15
2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original