Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Minor Change Letter

of 7

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

guidance only and must be considered in the context of the proposed change. A proposal that does not meet these
guidelines may still potentially be determined as ‘not substantially different development’.

A full assessment of the proposed changes against the relevant criteria has been completed and outlined in Table B and
Table C below. As shown, our assessment concludes that the proposed changes do not constitute ‘substantially different
development’ and comply with the criteria specified under the definition of a ‘minor change’ within Schedule 2 of the
Planning Act.



4.2. Schedule 2: Minor Change Criteria
 Table B: Assessment against minor change criteria (Planning Act)
 Would a new development application, including the
                                                               Y/N    Comments
 changes cause:

                                                                      The proposal does not involve prohibited
 The inclusion of prohibited development?                      N      development. The site is in the Urban footprint and the
                                                                      proposal involves a Reconfiguration of a Lot.

                                                                      The original development application was required to
 Referral to a referral agency, other than to the Chief
                                                                      be referred. However, the proposed changes will not
 Executive, if there were no referral agencies for the         Y
                                                                      result in any new referral material to any referral
 development application?
                                                                      agencies.

 Referral to extra referral agencies, other than the                  The proposed changes will not trigger referral to any
                                                               N
 Chief Executive?                                                     extra referral agencies.

                                                                      The proposed changes will not trigger any referral
 A referral agency to assess the application against or
                                                               N      agencies to assess the application against or have
 have regard to new matters?
                                                                      regard to any new matters.

                                                                      The original application was subject to impact
 Public notification if public notification was not                   assessment and as such public notification has
                                                               N
 required for the development application?                            previously been undertaken and no further notification
                                                                      is required.



4.3. Substantially Different Development Test
 Table C: Assessment against substantially different development test (DA Rules)
 Do the changes:                                               Y/N    Comments

                                                                      The proposal does not involve a new use. The proposal
 Involve a new use?                                            N
                                                                      seeks reconfiguration of a lot.

 Result in the application applying to a new parcel of                The requested changes do not apply to a new parcel of
                                                               N
 land?                                                                land.

                                                                      The proposed change is for reconfiguring a lot. The
 Dramatically change the built form in terms of scale,
                                                               N      requested change does not result in changes to the
 bulk and appearance?
                                                                      built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.

                                                                      The proposed changes will not change the ability for
 Change the ability for the approved use to operate as                the proposal to operate as intended. The development
                                                               N
 intended?                                                            remains a residential subdivision which is
                                                                      appropriately serviced by essential infrastructure.

 Remove a component that is integral to the operation                 The change does not remove any components that
                                                               N
 of the development?                                                  would impact the operation of the development



www.thereforgroup.com.au                            Minor Change Application (ROL) | 21-0694P/15
         3
Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Letter.pdf · 322 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.