Original source · versioned page text
Minor Change Letter
guidance only and must be considered in the context of the proposed change. A proposal that does not meet these
guidelines may still potentially be determined as ‘not substantially different development’.
A full assessment of the proposed changes against the relevant criteria has been completed and outlined in Table B and
Table C below. As shown, our assessment concludes that the proposed changes do not constitute ‘substantially different
development’ and comply with the criteria specified under the definition of a ‘minor change’ within Schedule 2 of the
Planning Act.
4.2. Schedule 2: Minor Change Criteria
Table B: Assessment against minor change criteria (Planning Act)
Would a new development application, including the
Y/N Comments
changes cause:
The proposal does not involve prohibited
The inclusion of prohibited development? N development. The site is in the Urban footprint and the
proposal involves a Reconfiguration of a Lot.
The original development application was required to
Referral to a referral agency, other than to the Chief
be referred. However, the proposed changes will not
Executive, if there were no referral agencies for the Y
result in any new referral material to any referral
development application?
agencies.
Referral to extra referral agencies, other than the The proposed changes will not trigger referral to any
N
Chief Executive? extra referral agencies.
The proposed changes will not trigger any referral
A referral agency to assess the application against or
N agencies to assess the application against or have
have regard to new matters?
regard to any new matters.
The original application was subject to impact
Public notification if public notification was not assessment and as such public notification has
N
required for the development application? previously been undertaken and no further notification
is required.
4.3. Substantially Different Development Test
Table C: Assessment against substantially different development test (DA Rules)
Do the changes: Y/N Comments
The proposal does not involve a new use. The proposal
Involve a new use? N
seeks reconfiguration of a lot.
Result in the application applying to a new parcel of The requested changes do not apply to a new parcel of
N
land? land.
The proposed change is for reconfiguring a lot. The
Dramatically change the built form in terms of scale,
N requested change does not result in changes to the
bulk and appearance?
built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.
The proposed changes will not change the ability for
Change the ability for the approved use to operate as the proposal to operate as intended. The development
N
intended? remains a residential subdivision which is
appropriately serviced by essential infrastructure.
Remove a component that is integral to the operation The change does not remove any components that
N
of the development? would impact the operation of the development
www.thereforgroup.com.au Minor Change Application (ROL) | 21-0694P/15
3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original