Minor Change Letter

 Response to Subsection 2(e)
 The responsible entity of this change request is Noosa Shire Council and not the chief executive.


    f.        if paragraphs (d) and (e) do not apply—all matters the responsible entity would or may assess against or have regard
              to, if the change application were a development application;

 Response to Subsection 2(f)
 Further to the original assessment of the development application, where potentially new matters of assessment have
 been identified, this letter and supporting plans and technical reports provide sufficient supporting information for
 Council to have regard to.


    g.        if another matter that the responsible entity considered relevant.

 Response to Subsection 2(g)
 As above


         3.      Subsections (4) and (5) apply if the responsible entity must, in assessing the change application under subsection
                 (2)(d), (e) or (f) consider —
                      a.   A statutory instrument; or
                      b.   Another document applied, adopted or incorporated (with or without changes) in a statutory
                           instrument.
         4.      The responsible entity must consider the statutory instrument, or other document, as in effect when the
                 development application for the development approval was properly made.
         5.      However, the responsible entity may give the weight the responsible entity considers is appropriate, in the
                 circumstances, to –
                      a.   The statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change application was made; or
                      b.   If the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the change application is
                           made but before it is decided – the amended or replacement instrument or document; or
                      c.   Another statutory instrument –
                                 i.   That comes into effect after the change application is made but before it is decided; and
                                ii.   That the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the instrument had been
                                      in effect when the development application for the development approval was properly
                                      made.

 Response to Subsections 3, 4 and 5
 The applicant has not identified any further statutory instruments or documents which would impact on Council’s
 assessment of the application. The applicant welcomes Council’s feedback in this regard and will provide any further
 information reasonably required and requested by Council to undertake its assessment.



6. Excluded Premises
In accordance with Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016, the applicant wishes to use the excluded premises provision in
lieu of providing owner’s consent.

It is understood that the proposed change to the subject site will not cause any effect on the rest of the development, and
since the development has been approved resulting in multiple owners, it is considered impracticable to be able to obtain
owner’s written consent of each lot owner. Notwithstanding, a list of all lots within the original application is provided in
Appendix B - PA Form 5.

www.thereforgroup.com.au                                Minor Change Application (ROL) | 21-0694P/15
         5