Original source · versioned page text
Minor Change Letter
No change to traffic flow or the transport network will
Significantly impacts on traffic flow or the transport
N be experienced as a result of this change. The yield of
network?
the development remains the same.
Introduce new impacts on increase the severity of The proposed changes will not introduce new impacts
N
known impacts? or increase the severity of any known impacts.
Remove an incentive or offset component that would The change does not propose to remove any offset
N
have balanced a negative impact of the development? components associated with the original approval.
No impact on infrastructure provisions. All required
Impact on infrastructure provisions? N
infrastructure will still be delivered.
5. Evaluation Against Relevant Assessment Criteria
Section 81(2) of the Planning Act sets forth criteria the responsible entity (which, in this instance, is Noosa Shire Council)
assessing a minor change application must consider. A response to the relevant assessment criteria is provided below to
assist with Council’s assessment.
2. In assessing the change application, the responsible entity must consider—
a. the information the applicant included with the application; and
Response to Subsection 2(a)
This covering letter and the supporting documentation provides a brief background of the approval history along with
an overview of the proposed changes to the development approval.
The proposed changes are supported by the agreement reached with Council with respect to the Child Care Centre
appeal (ref: 1998 of 2024).
The submitted assessment confirms the proposal meets the definition of a minor change as set out in the Planning
Act, and complies with the relevant matters of assessment, consistently with that previously approved.
b. if the responsible entity is the assessment manager⎯any properly made submissions about the development
application or another change application that was approved; and
Response to Subsection 2(b)
The original development application was subject to code assessment under the planning scheme and therefore,
while submissions can be made, no third-party appeal rights are provided to submitters.
c. any pre-request response notice or response notice given in relation to the change application; and
Response to Subsection 2(c)
A pre-request response was not provided.
d. if the responsible entity is, under section 78A(3), the Minister ⎯all matters the Minister would or may assess against
or have regard to, if the change application were a development application called in by the Minister; and
Response to Subsection 2(d)
The responsible entity of this change request is Noosa Shire Council and not the Minister.
e. if the responsible entity is, under section 78A(4), the chief executive—all matters the chief executive would or may
assess against or have regard to, if the change application were a development application declared to be an
application for State facilitated development under section 106D; and
www.thereforgroup.com.au Minor Change Application (ROL) | 21-0694P/15
4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original