Jen Drysdale submission 17 Dec 15

4. NON COMPLIANCE WITH RELEVANT PLANNING INSTRUMENTS:

 

The Applicant has completely failed to address the numerous and significant potential impacts of the
proposed Development on the adjoining School. The following specific areas of non-compliance are
noted:

 

Code Objective

Developer’s Assessment

Objectors’ Assessment

 

RECONFIGURING A LOT CODE

 

O9 The subdivision layout is
designed to facilitate
linkages with adjoining sites
in the immediate area.

O09 Complies:
The proposal will comply
where reasonably applicable.

Does not Comply

The phrase “reasonably applicable” is
unclear and the specific linkages with
adjoining sites in the immediate area
have not been considered or
adequately addressed.

 

010 Where the lots are to be
used for Industrial business
or Commercial business
uses, the layout provides for
appropriate buffer areas, to
mitigate possible impacts on
nearby residences or other
noise sensitive uses

010 Complies :
Landscaped buffering has
been provided along all
boundaries adjoining the
school to the east.

Does not Comply

The layout does not provide for
appropriate buffer areas, to mitigate
possible impacts on the adjacent
School. Landscape buffering is
insufficient and ineffective to mitigate
the negative impacts, including those
of fugitive emissions, of the
Development.

 

O12 An adequate and
accessible water supply is
provided for fire fighting
purposes.

$12.1- 12.2 Complies
Will comply as applicable.

Does not Comply

The Applicant has not adequately
addressed the issue of fire safety and
its potential impacts, particularly
given the proximity of the
Development to the adjacent School.

 

O32 Access easements are in
appropriate locations for
safe access and egress, and
supply appropriate widths
and levels of service for the
number of vehicles that will
utilise them

$32.1 Complies

It is considered that the
proposed access easement
has been designed in
accordance with Sections 2
and 3 of PSP5 Engineering
Design Standards — Roads,
Drainage and Earthworks.

Does not Comply

The proposed access is not
appropriate for the Development and
does not provide safe access and
egress nor does it provide for the
appropriate level of safety of school
children given its proximity to the
School

 

 

033 Traffic generated by the
development is within the
acceptable capacity of
external roads and does not
have an adverse impact
upon the functioning of the

 

$33.1 Complies
The development will comply
where reasonably applicable.

 

Does not Comply

“reasonably applicable” is
indeterminate. The proposed
Development does have an adverse
impact upon the functioning of the
road network. The Applicant has

 

12