Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Jen Drysdale submission 17 Dec 15

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Jennifer Drysdale.

of 27

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

 

Code Objective

Developer’s Assessment

Objectors’ Assessment

 

road network

failed to provide an objective
evidence or argument to show
otherwise.

 

BUSINESS USES CODE

 

020 Development is
designed and sited to avoid
noise emissions that
unreasonably diminish the
amenity of the area or
surrounding uses.

020 Complies

The proposed development is
suitably distanced and
buffered through landscaping
from sensitive land uses.
Further, as the site is located
ona busy road and
roundabout, it is considered
that there will be no
worsening effects in terms of

noise.

Does not Comply

The proposed Development is not
suitably distanced or buffered from
the adjacent School which is a
sensitive land use.

Statements to the effect that “it is
considered” that there will be no
worsening effects in terms of noise
are conjecture without supporting
evidence such as detailed studies
showing existing background noise
levels and projected additional noise
generation, particularly given the
proposed Development’s proximity to
the noise sensitive study environment
of the School

 

027 Buildings and structures
are designed to minimise
opportunities for vandalism.

 

$27.1 Complies

The proposed development
will incorporates a building
design and layout which will
provide for non-graffiti
friendly development,
structures and layout through
design within an absence of
natural ladders, minimal
unbroken vertical surface
areas, CCTV surveillance, a
small retail and fast food
component (not conducive to
loitering), a layout which will
promote passive surveillance
over the site, be well
illuminated and comprise
minimal opportunities for
concealment.

 

Does not Comply

All such facilities are conducive to
loitering and provide opportunities
for concealment which poses an
unacceptable danger to the students
going to and from the school
particularly in early mornings or
evenings before or after
extracurricular school activities.
Furthermore the close proximity of
such a facility poses and unacceptable
risk opening the way for graffiti,
vandalism, theft, damage to the
security of the School premises and
harm to its students.

 

 

TABLE 14-15 SERVICE STATION

 

13

 
Log in to download the original file

Jen Drysdale submission 17 Dec 15.pdf · 342 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.