Jen Drysdale submission 17 Dec 15

 

Code Objective

Developer’s Assessment

Objectors’ Assessment

 

what will fit on the site given its
proposed configuration.

The design of the facility on the
Property as currently proposed clearly
is not suitable as the Applicant is
unable to comply with the planning
scheme and must be rejected.

 

BUIDLING WORKS CODE

 

O1 Buildings and other
structures are appropriately
designed and sited to— a)
provide amenity for users of
the premises as well as
preserve the visual and
acoustic privacy of adjoining
and nearby land uses;

$1.1 Complies
Setbacks comply with
Schedule 1.

Does not Comply

The setbacks specified in Schedule 1
address probable, but not definitively
compliant solutions in the specific
circumstances. Given the nature of
the proposed Development the
Applicant has not demonstrated that
structures are appropriately designed
and sited to preserve the visual and
acoustic privacy of the adjoining
School.

 

 

018 Lighting associated with
the use or works does not
have an adverse impact
upon the amenity enjoyed
by users of adjoining or
nearby premises nor do it
cause unreasonable
disturbance to local fauna.

 

$18.1- $18.3 Not Applicable

$18.4 Complies

All lighting will comply with
the relevant requirements
where possible.

 

Does not Comply

‘where possible’ is insufficient, an
obfuscation, and furthermore an
acknowledgement that it is not
possible for the Applicant in its
current proposal to comply with
relevant requirements without
qualification as required under the
planning scheme.

The Applicant has failed to show by
any reasonable objective justification
that Lighting associated with the use
or operation of the proposed
Development does not have an
adverse impact upon the amenity
enjoyed by users of the adjoining
School.

 

20