Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

170903 ADAMS + SPARKES Minor Change Application · 51993.615.03

Attached to the e-mail Change to a Development Approval - 51993.615.03.

of 34

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

MINOR CHANGE TO EXISTING APPROVAL                                                                         3
6/13 NOOSA PARADE, NOOSA HEADS
It is noted that the development does not seek to vary the overall height of the building and will not result
in any additional overshadowing impacts on the adjoining residential development to the immediate
west.

The proposed development contains consistent northern, southern and eastern setbacks to the current
situation, with the only variation proposed to the western setbacks. The development proposes a setback
of 1.2 metres, which is compliant for a typical single storey development, however, is largely non-
compliant in this case due to the development containing a roof form, which integrates with the existing
development. It is noted that the development could be designed to provide a compliant setback,
however, this would result in an inferior design outcome. Further discussion on this will be provided in
Section 2 below.




Figure 2 Elevations (Source: DCM Building Design)




Figure 3 Section (Source: DCM Building Design)


In order to facilitate the extension, the removal of approximately four (4) palms are required between the
existing built form and the boundary (demonstrated in Figure 4 below). In addition to this, the additions
are proposed to be located over an existing sewer main, which runs between the boundary and the
existing building (demonstrated in contour and detail survey - Appendix 2).

In support of the application, a Service Advice Notice was requested from Unitywater, which identified
the below comments relating to building over assets:
    •    Unitywater permits construction over existing sewerage mains. For the current proposal
         Unitywater advises a redesign of the proposal is required to address the above requirement for
         clearances to the sewerage property connection (1 metre from any property connection);
    •    Should you proceed with a redesigned proposal to meet the property connection clearance
         requirements and the proposal still involves building over the existing sewerage main, the
         following will be required to be submitted to Unitywater for assessment:
TIM BARRETT AND JANE EAKIN
MARCH 2018

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.6 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

170903 ADAMS + SPARKES Minor Change Application.pdf · 3.6 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.