Original source · versioned page text
2014-03-25 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda Pages 168-231
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 25 MARCH 2014
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 195 of 231
3 Final Evaluation
| Su ns h ne Coa st Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
Contract No: 13147001
Boreen Point Camp Ground Management Agreement
PRICE
No.|NAME OF TENDERER excl of GST
1 $77,000 Geicciplian: fone So = ord a re
2 $77,000
3 $77,000 The ratings:
A | REN a aS aS |S + 0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
5S [Ra cep ae ee ee |e eS +20 (twenty) = Very Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
6 URS ise aes =e |S ea | + 40 (forty) = Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate tisk
7 |S ei ee te ae ees ees ee tat + 60 (sixty) = Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is mertable and will need to be monitored if awarded
8 RR aac ee eee I | eee ee ae +80 (eighty) = Very Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
9 [CS er areecee Tani get ee oe EC a ie Sl Soap scac ae +100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional — the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advant:
10 | ERR ag eee | Pe
99 | CC Ee re axe ee ee ee ae ee S| Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for
12 | RSE ae ae ee |e a ea
13 | Sa oe | PE Se]
14 | Eee Se nese oleae | I
176; | se ae a ele re Sr
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS Number of Tenders Evaluated = [ 3 |
[Seana Sneed Pest] Doinotevaluate
SSS re TS So | Doinottevaliate:
1 2 3
7 Compass eer
— / _
Resultant Resultant Resultant
weighting weighting weighting
as aes =n ae en % = 2 eae = | 7 ASIST i aera
PACERS UAL AE Hse Le Seow fed Wa ere seater, saceeaued
Total Technical Score OO 2a | 05 | —«aSC=*d
Normalised Technical Score (Tn)
PART B - Price element Compass Coaching
Total Fees (Pc) 0% 3 577,000 $77,000 $77,000
Average Fees (Pav) $........seceseneeeee $77,000 eh s
Price Score 100 100 100
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 100 100 100
Weighted Price Score (Pw)
Total Score of price and non price 97 mT:
elements | =
OTHER DETAILS
Assesment panel member 1 Sarah Hansen
Assesment panel member 2 Clint Irwin
Assesment panel member 3 John McCarron
Assesment panel member 4 Michelle Stirling The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
Assesment panel member 5 demonstrate the net result from assessment panel members.
Assesment panel member 6 Dissentions from individual panel members are noted below.
Assesment panel member 7 = ‘
Assesment panel member 8 &
QBSA LICENCE CHECKED (if applicable) Contract Administrator's signature:
Ne
Link to CGC Contract Award Report: htto://scrcintranet/qovpol/procurement/T enders%200ver%20150000tender_templates.doc
Link to draft acceptance letter: http://scrcintranet/govpol/procurement/T enders%200ver%20150000/tender templates.doc
Note: This sheet and the signed assessment sheets of individual assessors must be placed in Council's ECM records system.
17-Jun-2013
Page 195 of 231See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.