Original source · versioned page text
2016-02-02 P&O Committee - Item 7 - Attachment 1 - Waste Management PBA Draft Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Impact Area Impact Criteria Impact Benefits / Cost Description Qualitative Assessment
Type
Likelihood Consequence Impact
Definition targets as a result of the adoption of the CBU model may
provide for increased marketing activities and external
NET product sales (and profitability)..
BENEFIT Benefits The identification of all costs associated with the business Low Low Low Benefit
(low) may be enhanced via continued refinement of cost
attribution to the business, in addition to the recognition
and appropriate cost recovery of any non-commercial
functions and activities via CSO payments from the general
fund.
Costs Additional costs associated with CBU marketing and Moderate Low Low Cost
branding may not realise increased product sales due to
the competitive nature of the market.
Noosa Council Community Benefits Non-commercial activities undertaken by the business Very High Very Low Medium Benefit
Budget Position Service Provision would be able to continue without community impact
funded via transparent CSO payments from the general
NET fund.
BENEFIT Costs Nil Identified n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
(medium)
Financial Benefits Requires the business to set prices on a commercial basis Very High Moderate High Benefit
Sustainability in a transparent manner to ensure long-term business
viability and contribute to Council’s financial sustainability
NET through the payment of dividends, competitive neutrality
BENEFIT payments and taxation equivalents.
(medium) Benefits Clearly defined service levels and performance standards Low Low Low Benefit
documented in service level agreements between Council
and the CBU may assist Council in gaining productivity
improvements for internal services.
Costs Possibility that reduced payments for internal support Low Moderate Low Cost
services from the business (via formal service level
agreements) would still need to be funded through other
areas of Council’s operations (provided existing levels of
internal services remain).
Ratepayer Impact Benefits There would be a greater focus on ensuring that charges High High High Benefit
are set at cost recovery levels, with dividend and taxation
NET payments from the business potentially available to the
BENEFIT Council general fund for broader community benefit.
(medium)
Costs There may be negative ratepayer impacts of more Low Moderate Low Cost
commercial decisions in the provision of waste services to
Waste Management Public Benefit Assessment Page 20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.