Original source · versioned page text
2016-02-02 P&O Committee - Item 7 - Attachment 1 - Waste Management PBA Draft Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Impact Area Impact Criteria Impact Benefits / Cost Description Qualitative Assessment
Type
Likelihood Consequence Impact
the community under the CBU model (e.g.
reduced network of transfer stations, reduced recycling),
although Council still retains the ultimate decision-making
power regarding the setting of rates and charges under
both business models.
Compliance Benefits The application of full cost pricing will ensure that the Very High Moderate High Benefit
business complies with the relevant aspects of competitive
MIXED IMPACT neutrality applicable to a significant business activity in a
competitive business environment.
Costs Council would face increased compliance relating to the Very High Low Medium Cost
need to support the CBU, including service level
agreement negotiation and documentation, corporate plan
reporting requirements, taxation equivalent returns,
reporting the business separately within the annual budget
and consolidating the business annual performance plan
outcomes within Council’s annual report, etc.
Market Market Pricing Benefits The adoption of commercial, full cost recovery pricing Very High Moderate High Benefit
principles will ensure that product prices are targeted at a
NET minimum level that reflects the full economic cost of
BENEFIT service, whilst ensuring that competitive neutrality
(low) principles are complied with when considering pricing
strategies with respect to market share.
Costs Additional costs associated with the CBU model Very High Low Medium Cost
(compliance costs) would need to be recovered through
prices charged to customers.
Competitive Benefits Under both the CBU and FCP models, the business would Very High Moderate High Benefit
Neutrality Costs be required to set prices under the competitive neutrality n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
principle, therefore eliminating any potential advantages
NET associated with local government ownership and ensuring
BENEFIT that prices are set on the same basis as private operators.
(high)
Business Staff Resourcing Benefits Nil identified n.a. n.a. Nil Benefit
Costs Additional costs would likely be incurred to allow the Very High Moderate High Cost
NET COST business to maximise commercial opportunities as well as
(low) to ensure CBU compliance with additional statutory
reporting requirements.
Morale Benefits The management autonomy created by CBU reforms may Moderate Low Low Benefit
potentially assign a certain degree of responsibility and a
MIXED IMPACT stronger performance culture to the business and therefore
its employees.
Costs The adoption of the CBU model would result in additional Moderate Low Low Cost
compliance related responsibilities for the business
Waste Management Public Benefit Assessment Page 21
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.