Original source · versioned page text
2016-02-02 P&O Committee - Item 7 - Attachment 1 - Waste Management PBA Draft Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Impact Area Impact Criteria Impact Benefits / Cost Description Qualitative Assessment
Type
Likelihood Consequence Impact
manager and administrative staff, and may impact
adversely on staff morale if resources were insufficient to
cope with any increased workload (and additional
resources were not provided).
Customers Pricing Benefits The adoption of user pays pricing principles will ensure that Very High Moderate High Benefit
Costs all customers are treated in an equitable manner and there n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
NET are no cross subsidies between customers in product
BENEFIT supply.
(high)
Customer Service Benefits Waste and recycling services would be provided by the Moderate Low Low Benefit
Provision CBU which would be branded as such to deal with
customer service issues directly in accordance with its
MIXED IMPACT established service level performance targets.
Costs Some confusion may occur in the community regarding Low Low Low Cost
whether the CBU is focussed on maximising profits or
meeting social and environmental objectives
Regional Supporting Benefits Full cost pricing practices provides the funds necessary to Very High Low Medium Benefit
Development Regional ensure appropriate ongoing investment in waste
and Economic Development infrastructure to continue to support ongoing regional
Stability demand for waste services, providing business and
NET industry with the resources required to continue ongoing
BENEFIT regional development.
(low) Costs Additional costs would be incurred under a CBU model due Moderate Low Low Cost
to additional compliance related responsibilities for the
business manager and administrative staff.
Sustainable Benefits Appropriate price signals would be sent to businesses High Low Medium Benefit
Investment looking to invest in the region.
Costs Additional costs would be incurred under a CBU model due Moderate Low Low Cost
NET to additional compliance related responsibilities for the
BENEFIT business manager and administrative staff.
(low)
Social Welfare Equity Between Benefits The adoption of full cost pricing principles on a per product Very High Low Medium Benefit
and Equity Customers Costs basis will ensure that individual products are appropriately n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
priced relative to the market (and allow transparent
NET decision making should cross subsidisation between
BENEFIT products and respective customer groups through specific
(medium) pricing arrangements be required).
Ratepayer Equity Benefits Transparent decision making regarding the provision of Moderate Low Low Benefit
Costs non-commercial and community-focused activities should n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
Waste Management Public Benefit Assessment Page 22
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.