Original source · versioned page text
Information Response - Email 1 of 2 MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (22.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
RE: Response to Info Request – 215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach Item 21 Prepare a Bushfire Management Plan for the proposed use of the site that addresses the requirements of the Noosa Plan Natural Hazards Overlay Code for Bushfire Hazard Area. All bushfire management requirements/measures must be wholly contained and managed by the proposed development and not rely on or place liability on adjacent landholders. Response As discussed above, the Bushfire Management Plan (DFS Group 2015) was prepared for the entire site and included consideration of any future use of the Balance Land for residential purposes. The BMP included an assessment of compliance with the Overlay Code and suggested that the proposed development of the site was "generally in accordance" with the code. This BMP was subsequently approved. The JWA letter dated 16th December 2017 refers to a cleared 3 m wide maintenance track on adjacent land to the west (park) contributing to the asset protection zone. An Asset Protection Zone (APZ) provides a defensive tool to assist in the reduction of potential bushfire impact to people and property situated in bushfire prone areas by proving separation between assets (people and property) and hazardous vegetation. Whilst Council have stated that all bushfire management requirements/measures must be wholly contained and managed by the proposed development, and that reliance on land managers outside the development area for reducing bushfire risk must not be a bushfire response strategy, it is obvious that the cleared 3 m wide maintenance track on adjacent land to the west would increase the separation distance between the hazardous vegetation and the proposed development. Provided that the required access track is regularly slashed and the landscape/vegetated buffer maintained in accordance with the requirements of the approved BMP, it is considered that the bushfire risk on the site would be maintained at appropriate levels. Item 22 Prepare a Bushfire Management Plan for the proposed use of the site that addresses the latest SPP Fireline Intensity Model (CSIRO) using an FFDI of 48 to derive the appropriate bushfire hazard class for the lot. Response The Australian Standard AS 3959- 2009 - Construction of buildings in bushfire prone areas defines Fire Danger Index (FDI) as the chance of a fire starting, its rate of spread, its intensity and the difficulty of its suppression, according to various combinations of air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and both the long and short term drought effects. The FDI is an input utilised in various fire models and fire behaviour equations (e.g. McArthur 1973; Noble et al. 1980) however the dominant hazardous vegetation adjacent to the site is heath vegetation and the standard fire behaviour equation (i.e. Catchpole et al. 1998) utilises rate of spread, average wind speed at 10m above the ground, and average height of classified vegetation as inputs, rather than the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI). Ref: AM/Q15012/Lw3 JWA Pty Ltd 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.