Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Information Response - Email 1 of 2 MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 124

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (22.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Our Ref: 16075/170317.km
                                                                                          Level 10, 87 Wickham Tce
                                                                                           Spring Hill Brisbane 4000

March 22, 2017
                                                                                                  Ph: 07 3839 1400


                                                                                     [email protected]
                                                                                     www.urbaneconomics.com.au
Scanlon Group
c/o Mr Mark Dunleavy
Dunleavy Holdings Pty Ltd

E: [email protected]



Dear Mark,

RE: Essence of Peregian Beach Needs Analysis

Introduction

Urban Economics is pleased to provide this response to the Information Request issued by Noosa Shire Council.
This response should be read in conjunction with the Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) report dated December
2016, prepared by Urban Economics examining need for and potential impacts of the proposed Essence of
Peregian development in Peregian Beach.

As recommended by Noosa Shire Council, we have made contact with Council’s consultants Location IQ, and
sought clarification around some of the questions and issues identified within the Information Request relating to
the economic report. This Response provides further clarity around the issues and questions raised, and provides
additional information and research as appropriate.

RFI Response

    1. An examination of the implications of the proposed development on campers and RV users.




                                                                                                                  1
Log in to download the original file

Information Response - Email 1 of 2 MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 22.0 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.