Council archive · source document
07/2398 - Request for information response [As Published] · 132007.2398
" 2.0 Response The submitted traffic report’ undertaken by McCormick Rankin Cagney (MRC) assessed the impact that the proposed development would have on the external road network, which included the intersection of Diamond Street and Elm Street, during the AM and PM peak hour periods up to the design horizon year of 2020. The 2010 and 2020 traffic volumes were determined from factoring 2007 survey data by a 3% pa compound growth rate. Intersection analysis software SIDRA3.2 was used to determine what additional impact the proposed development would have on the operation of the Elm Street / Diamond Street intersection during the AM and PM road peak periods. Figure 4 of the initial traffic report (Ref 1) illustrated the layout of the existing intersection and is replicated below. eT Figure 1. Existing Eim Street / Diamond Street intersection The performance criterion upon which performance intersections is assessed is defined in Section 6.4.1 - Limits of acceptable operation of the Department of Main Roads document? which states: ‘Priority junctions — the Degree of Saturation for any movement should not exceed 0.80 \ > Queue lengths — the 95%ile confidence limit should generally be used for queue fengthse ImN 80 ' Cooroy Retirement Community, 19 Trading Post Road, Traffic impact Assessment, 14 July 2008. McCormick Rankin Cagney. ? Guidelines for Assessment of Road impacts of Development, 1 April,2006, Queensland Department of Main Roads, 9427-002(1) - AFl.doc if ol he get
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/2398 - Request for information response [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.