Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

07/2398 - Request for information response [As Published] · 132007.2398

of 42

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 

 

Based on the DMR defined limits, the analysis concluded the following:

1. During 2010, without the development the unsignalised intersection of Etm Street /
Diamond Street will operate within an acceptable degree of saturation in both the AM
and PM peak periods {ie 0.60 and 0.47 respectively). Refer Table 3 below extracted
from the traffic report (Ref 1).

Table 3: 2010 Base Case Traffic SIDRA Analyses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highest
Totat Highest
n Traffic En aerate OO rns oon a AM Level Of
intersection (vph) Delay (sec) 2 0. 9
‘AM Peak Hour
Em Street /
Stree! 1837 0.60 40 18.2 D
Ein Street /
865 0.30 12 12 8B
Elm Street / ¢
. rect 1693 0.47 22 29 Do 4
‘Bim Street 7
D Road 860 0.23 17 12 B

 

 

Note: Practical Maximum Degree of Saturation (X,) for unsignalised intersections is 0.80.

2. During 2010, the unsignalised intersection of Elm Street / Diamond Street will continue~ ~*~“

to operate within an acceptable degree of saturation in both the AM and PM peak
periods with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed development. Refer
Table 6 below extracted from the traffic report (Ref 1).

Table 6; 2010 Design Analysis - Elm Street / Diamond Street - unsignalised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Movement Volume Degree of Delay (s) 95” %ile Queue
(vph) Saturation () (m)
/ AM Peak Hour
Elm Street (south (7) 334 0.18 0.0 0
Eim Street (south (R)) 252 0.35 14 18
Diamond Street (L) 427 0.62 16 42
Diamond Street (R) 89 0.51 40 20
Elm Street North (L) 272 0.15 8.4 0
Elm Street North (1) 533 0.28 0.0 0
PM Peak Hour
Elm Street.South (1) 399 0.21 0.0 0
Elm Street South (R) 306 0.30 11 14
Diamond Street (L) 370 0.43° 12 24
Diamond Strest (R) 132 0.57 34 24
Elm Street North (L) 215 0.12 9 0
Elm Street North (T) 374 0.20 0.0 0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Practical Maximum Degree of Saturation (x,) for unsignalised intersections is 0.80. c

 

werw.mrcagney.com consuitants in transportation

 

 

9427-002(1) - RFi.doc

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.2 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2398 - Request for information response [As Published].pdf · 2.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.