Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object- Linda Suter

of 27

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Code Objective                     Developer's    Assessment           Objectors'    Assessment

                                   there considered that 10            The Applicant furthermore         provides
                                   spaces is appropriate.              no justification     for its derived value of
                                                                       10 other than it is what will fit on the
                                                                       site given its proposed configuration.


                                                                       Furthermore        the Applicant provides
                                                                       no data or objective evidence by way
                                                                       of survey, industry statistics or
                                                                       otherwise    to justify its assessment of
                                                                       the likely number of users of the
                                                                       service station to refuel vehicles
                                                                       versus to use the retail facility. The
                                                                       number is simply derived to fit with
                                                                       the number configurable        on the
                                                                       Property and within the design
                                                                       proposed by the Applicant.


                                                                       It is the Applicant's    responsibility        to
                                                                       provide a compliant       design - the
                                                                       current design is clearly non-
                                                                       compliant    and must be rejected.



09 Parking areas are located       09 Complies                         Does not Comply
where they will not unduly         Car parking is located at the       The Applicant states that the car park
conflict with pedestrians and      front ofthe    building, the most   is located to be "the most suitable
will not dominate   the            suitable location for a service     location for a service station use        ll




streetscape.                       station use.                        which is not the requirement         but a
                                                                       function of the proposed design.


                                                                       The Applicant has failed to address
                                                                       the requirement       and demonstrate
                                                                       that Parking areas are located where
                                                                       they will not unduly conflict with
                                                                       pedestrians. The Applicant has failed
                                                                       to address the requirement         and
                                                                       demonstrate        that parking areas are
                                                                       located where they will not unduly
                                                                       conflict with pedestrians and will not
                                                                       dominate the streetscape.

011 Access and egress                                                  Does not Comply
points do not impact on the                                            Given the nature of the development
safety and operations     of the                                       and proximity      to the School the




                                                                                                                           22
Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object- Linda Suter.pdf · 10.1 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.