Original source · versioned page text
2018-05-14 General Committee Meeting Notes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 MAY 2018
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act
2016.
A. An independent planning assessment of the application and officers’ report that
considers the most appropriate land use definition for the proposed use including
whether the use is more appropriately defined under The Noosa Plan as an industrial
use or home based business; and
B. Legal advice as to the extent to which Council should consider the cumulative impact
of both permitted, approved and unapproved uses on the site as part of this
application.
Amendment
Moved: Cr Wellington
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That an additional item C be added to the motion to read:
C. Note that an appropriate building approval may need to be obtained for the shipping
container currently on the site if the container is to remain in situ and that Council
officers notify the owners of this requirement.
Carried.
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Glasgow
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 8 May 2018 regarding Application No. MCU17/0546 for a
Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Home Based Business - Type 3
Significant Scale situated at 54 Boronia Rd, Cootharaba and defer the matter to a future
Council meeting in order to seek;
A. An independent planning assessment of the application and officers’ report that
considers the most appropriate land use definition for the proposed use including
whether the use is more appropriately defined under The Noosa Plan as an industrial
use or home based business; and
B. Legal advice as to the extent to which Council should consider the cumulative impact
of both permitted, approved and unapproved uses on the site as part of this
application.
C. Note that an appropriate building approval may need to be obtained for the shipping
container currently on the site if the container is to remain in situ and that Council
officers notify the owners of this requirement.
Cr Jackson called for a division on the voting. The motion was Carried 3/2.
For: Crs. Jurisevic, Stockwell, Wellington
Against: Crs. Glasgow, Jackson
Cr Wilkie returned to the meeting.
Page 2 of 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.