Original source · versioned page text
Appendix E - Code Compliance Reports
From the archive REC14/0005 Reconfiguration of a lot - 178 Eumundi Noosa Road, Noosaville. File date in the archive: 2014-04-04 12:20.
RECONFIGURING OF A LOT CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
minimisation of potential for crime,
vandalism and fear by maximising
opportunities for casual surveillance of
public spaces; and
(g) establishment of a sense of place.
O5 N/A Not applicable – the proposal is not a residential
House site areas are— No solution provided. development.
(a) located at least 50m from any land
including within a national park,
conservation park, state forest
reserve, nature refuge, coordinated
conservation area or wilderness area;
and
(b) not located on steep slopes.
O6 S6.1 N/A Not applicable – the proposal is not a residential
Lots for residential development are A variety of lot sizes and shapes is development.
designed to ensure variety in residential provided within the subdivision.
streetscapes.
O7 S7.1 N/A Not applicable – no new road is proposed.
The street network— Where involving the construction of a new
(a) has design features, which convey the road, road planning and design supports
primary function of each type of street the hierarchy and functional aspects
and encourage driver behaviour, identified in Sections 2 and 3 of PSP5
speeds and traffic volumes that are Engineering Design Standards – Roads,
safe and appropriate to that function; Drainage and Earthworks; and
(b) provides a high level of internal
accessibility both within the site and to S7.2 N/A Not applicable – no new road is proposed.
external sites and appropriate external Road and pathway planning and design is
connections for vehicles, pedestrian in accordance with, in order of
and cycle movements; precedence—
(c) deters through-traffic from residential (a) Noosa Integrated Local Transport
areas and creates safe conditions for Plan;
local road users, pedestrians and (b) Queensland Transport’s Shaping Up
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix E
A/S = Alternative Solution Code Compliance Reports
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
Gateway Drive, Noosaville Page 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original