Council archive · source document
Minor Change Request report 2022 · 51980.2682.01
3 February 2022 Planning Noosa Council [email protected] RE: Minor Change Request – (TPL21) – Cosmetic Changes to Existing Building – 41 Sunshine Beach Rd, Noosa Heads (BUP3943) Proposal The proposal seeks some minor changes to the development approval including cosmetic changes to the building and internal layout as generally depicted in Figure.1 below. Figure.1 Existing Site Photo looking northeast the building and proposed render looking north (Source: Google Maps) Detailed changes between the existing and proposed building are outlined below. • New window hoods and fascia board to the façade. • Replace existing awning with castella fascia metal sheet roofing to hidden box gutter. • Larger shopfront glazing and doors to existing five shopfronts • Rebuild roof to match existing pitch and install skylights • Replace stairwell in western corner of the site to spiral – without impacting existing carparking areas. • Provide for open platform lift to allow for equitable access to offices on the first level and wider stairs to Berrima Row in accordance with current BCA standards. • Replace balustrading to carpark • Remove existing signage poles and integrate with awning • New coloured concrete footpath to boundary There are no changes to the existing external footpath, removal of vegetation, or carparking layout.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
Background
On 20 June 1980, Council approved a shopping centre development including shops and
offices (TPL21).
On 18 March 2021, Council approved the redevelopment of the site for a new Development
Permit for Food and Drink Outlet, Office and Shops.
Unfortunately the increase in materials over the past 12 to 18 months has had a huge
impact on the cost of building and the pricing from the tenderers was between 35% and
55% above the Quantity Surveyor estimates. As a result, the owner could not make the
redevelopment viable to proceed.
Minor Change Test
An assessment against the meaning of minor change and a response about the proposed
application is provide below. The Planning Act 2016 defines a minor change as a change
to the approval that:
i. would not result in a substantially different development*;
(*In determining whether the proposed change would result in substantially
different development, the assessment manager or referral agency must
consider the individual circumstances of the development, in the context of
the change proposed.)
Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules set outs provisions for a substantially
different development. A change may be considered to result in a substantially different
development if the proposed change results in any of the following outlined in Table 1
below.
Table 1 - Substantially different development
Provisions of Schedule 1 of the DA Rules Response
(a) Involves a new use There is no new use proposed onsite
(b) results in the application applying to No new parcels of land is introduced
a new parcel of land; or
(c) dramatically changes the built form in The built form generally remains
terms of scale, bulk and appearance; unchanged apart from cosmetic changes
or and upgrading accessibility. This minor
change does not dramatically change the
scale, bulk or appearance.
(d) changes the ability of the proposed There is no change proposed to the
development to operate as operation of the commercial building.
intended; or
(e) removes a component that is The development remains a commercial
integral to the operation of the building.
development; or
(f) significantly impacts on traffic flow There are no changes to the tenancy
and the transport network, such as sizes and the existing carparking is
increasing traffic to the site; or provided byway of the original
contribution and onsite parking.
Page 3
(g) introduces new impacts or increase No new impacts or the severity of impacts
the severity of known impacts; or is likely to result from the cosmetic
changes.
(h) removes an incentive or offset Does not remove an offset or incentive
component that would have component of the development.
balanced a negative impact of the
development; or
(i) impacts on infrastructure provisions. There is not additional impacts on
infrastructure.
Given the above, the proposed change to the existing approval is a minor change in
accordance with Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 and Schedule 1 of the Development
Assessment Rules.
Deciding the Request
In accordance with S81 of The Planning Act 2016, Council must only consider the
information provided and any other matter considered relevant, including — all matters
Council would or may assess against or have regard to, if the change application were a
development application.
Council must only consider the statutory instrument, or other document, as in effect when
the development application for the development approval was properly made. However,
may give weight they consider appropriate, in the circumstances, to—
(a) the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change
application was made (Superseded Planning Scheme); or
(b) if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the
change application is made but before it is decided—the amended or replacement
instrument or document; or
(c) another statutory instrument—
(i) that comes into effect after the change application is made but before
it is decided; and
(ii) that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the
instrument had been in effect when the development application for the
development approval was properly made.
Assessment
The external changes do not change existing tenancy sizes or result in additional
carparking impacts that were considered as part of the original approval. The cosmetic
changes reduce the existing cluttering of signage and incorporates the signage boxes into
a new awning consistent with the relevant Noosa Plan provisions.
The access to the first floor allows for all users to access the upstairs commercial tenancies
as well as providing for a more elegant and efficient secondary access to the carpark. The
proposal is consistent with the existing approval and The current Noosa Plan 2020 design
outcomes.
The original approval did not include any conditions as seen in Figure.2 below, and it is
expected the plans will be approved subject to new reasonable and relevant conditions that
take into consideration s.81 of The Planning Act.
Page 4
Figure.2 Existing Planning Approval TPL22 If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact myself. Regards, Jack Lewis B.Sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago MPIA Planner/Director Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd 0406 334 227
Used in these records
Minor Change Request report 2022.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 488 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.