Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

Minor Change Request report 2022 · 51980.2682.01

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

     (g) introduces new impacts or increase       No new impacts or the severity of impacts
          the severity of known impacts; or       is likely to result from the cosmetic
                                                  changes.
     (h) removes an incentive or offset           Does not remove an offset or incentive
         component that would have                component of the development.
         balanced a negative impact of the
         development; or
      (i) impacts on infrastructure provisions.   There is not additional impacts on
                                                  infrastructure.

Given the above, the proposed change to the existing approval is a minor change in
accordance with Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 and Schedule 1 of the Development
Assessment Rules.


Deciding the Request

In accordance with S81 of The Planning Act 2016, Council must only consider the
information provided and any other matter considered relevant, including — all matters
Council would or may assess against or have regard to, if the change application were a
development application.

Council must only consider the statutory instrument, or other document, as in effect when
the development application for the development approval was properly made. However,
may give weight they consider appropriate, in the circumstances, to—

     (a) the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change
         application was made (Superseded Planning Scheme); or
     (b) if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the
         change application is made but before it is decided—the amended or replacement
         instrument or document; or
     (c) another statutory instrument—
              (i)      that comes into effect after the change application is made but before
              it is decided; and
              (ii)     that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the
              instrument had been in effect when the development application for the
              development approval was properly made.

Assessment

The external changes do not change existing tenancy sizes or result in additional
carparking impacts that were considered as part of the original approval. The cosmetic
changes reduce the existing cluttering of signage and incorporates the signage boxes into
a new awning consistent with the relevant Noosa Plan provisions.

The access to the first floor allows for all users to access the upstairs commercial tenancies
as well as providing for a more elegant and efficient secondary access to the carpark. The
proposal is consistent with the existing approval and The current Noosa Plan 2020 design
outcomes.

The original approval did not include any conditions as seen in Figure.2 below, and it is
expected the plans will be approved subject to new reasonable and relevant conditions that
take into consideration s.81 of The Planning Act.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
488 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Request report 2022.pdf · 488 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.