Original source · versioned page text
Response to Council IR
Page 2 Item 2: Please provide an analysis and demonstrate the carparking onsite is sufficient for the intended use. Historical parking generation data should be included. Applicant’s Response to Item 2: Please refer to Attachment D which provides a response prepared by Civil Design Drafting. The response concludes that there is sufficient carparking on site to cater for the increased numbers. Item 3: Demonstrate Rules Road is of a sufficient standard to provide safe access to the site when considering the proposed increase in traffic generation expected from the proposal. Applicant’s Response to Item 3: Please refer to Attachment D which provides a response prepared by Civil Design Drafting. The response concludes that sections of Rules Road are not compliant with the required carriageway width however the traffic generated by the proposal is stated as not changing the road classification and sufficient for the proposal. The applicant considers that they have now responded to Council’s information request. Could you please provide us with a list of adjoining owners so we can commence public notification of the application. Please contact our Sunshine Coast office if you require any further information and/or clarification. Yours faithfully, Nadine Gorton Senior Planner martoo consulting pty. ltd
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.