Council archive · source document
06/0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published] · 132006.823
Very large file (42.4 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
53. In its natural condition (prior to farming), the watercourse would have been shaded by tall trees along its north-eastem side. Although this buffering forest was removed decades ago, exposing this side of the riparian zone to sunlight and other edge effects (such as weed invasion), the native vegetation adjacent to the watercourse remains a shade-tolerant mixture of species. The existing canopy trees, vines, ferns and other understorey species are adapted to germination and growth in shade, as are the proposed species to be used for revegetation in existing gaps. The proposed buildings will provide additional shade during the morning, but to no greater extent than the original natural conditions of the valley. Noise and lighting impacts on fauna In its natural condition, the narrow intermittent watercourse and its associated vegetation probably provided habitat and movement corridor route for a range of fauna, although not as many as a wide permanent stream. Some of the species originally present may have been sensitive to construction noise, night-time lighting and human activity. However decades of clearing, grazing and rural activity in the valley appear to have reduced the faunal diversity of the watercourse area, and the species which currently use the corridor are generally tolerant of nearby disturbance. There will be no high-intensity street lights or security lighting shining into this area, and although there will be some low-level light spill from the adjacent unit windows and balconies, there is no evidence that any of the fauna using the corridor will be affected. The 20 to 50 metre forested corridor along the watercourse will still allow a wide dark band of habitat at night-time. Water harvestin Most of the flows in the watercourse are from the upstream catchment, with only a minor proportion from overland flows and runoff across the valley floor. While the proposed development will intercept flows from the hillslope and from within the developed area, these will be redirected to discharge to the watercourse at controlled outfall points. The watercourse is naturally adapted to variability in flows, and the hydrological inputs to the watercourse will not be changed to any significant degree likely to affect riparian ecology. Construction activity and bank stability All construction activity will be excluded from the riparian buffer zone, the banks will be retained with their current landform and vegetation (plus additional rehabilitation planting) and no uncontrolled stormwater discharge will take place. Please refer to Items 70 and 71 of this Response for further detail regarding the impact of construction activity. . Please provide confirmation that the Cryptocarya foetida protection area on Fig. 1- Habitat Protection Area is not to be impacted on by the adjacent development. The proposed Villa accommodation units are no closer to the Cryptocarya habitat area than those in the CAS, which included buffers to protect this species. Areas likely to be affected by the proposed gabion wall extension and new roads along the north-western edge of the subject site have been surveyed and no additional Cryptocarya have been found. Page 27
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
06/0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 42.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.