06/0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published] · 132006.823

 

By typically locating the proposed internal road network
in the same location as the original farm tracks and
“haul roads”, the siting of the proposed buildings further
compliments the landforms of the subject site, with the
larger buildings stepping down the slope towards the
creek.

 

e) utilise various building styles and materials to
create diversity and visual interest in the

streetscape;

v - The larger buildings, as a result of Building Code
requirements have a concrete/masonry super structure
with lightweight infill panets. The resuiting elevational
treatment and various materials alleviates visual
monotony similar to the Morwong Villas.

 

q make use of verandahs, eaves, and roof
overhangs for aesthetic, and lifestyle reasons;

v - Balconies, eaves, roof overhangs, and window
awnings/screens are prevalent throughout the proposal,
and are tocated on each building. This assists with
indoor/outdoor living, rain protection, reduction in sun
glare and privacy.

 

integrate landscaping into the building design to
provide visual relief and screening; and

9)

v - Landscaping has been integrated throughout the
development to provide visual relief and screening of
proposed buildings, whilst integrating the proposal with
the wider context of Noosa Hill.

 

h) present well articulated fagades where garages or
carports are not the dominant visual element when

viewed from the street.

 

 

v - The building facades of the larger buildings that
address the internal road networks are articulated with
balconies, screens and varying building planes. As
previously detailed the larger buildings cannot be
viewed from any streets external to the site.

 

As can be seen above the proposal complies with Specific Outcome 043 of the Noosa Heads

Locality Code.

it is considered that the built form of Blocks K, M & N and the residential component of Block

E do not comply with 044 of the Noosa Heads Locality Code.

in the reassessment of the

proposal as required by Item 1 of this Information Request, please address the compliance
and/or non-compliance of all structures on the site with relation to this Outcome.

Following is an assessment of the proposal against Probable Solution $44.1 contained within

the Noosa Heads Locality Code.

 

$44.1 Buildings have no more than 6 attached
dwelling units.

 

 

X — The proposal provides Buildings with greater that 6
attached dwelling units.

 

larger buildings against Specific Outcome 044:

As the proposed larger buildings do not comply with $44.1, following is an assessment of the

 

044 Buildings and structures take the form of small
separate buildings, rather than large single bulky
developments.

 

 

~“- Amendments to the larger building design resulting
from the increased creek setback has improved the
buildings stepping and articulation. Further, the
Proposed lightweight building materials and balcony
treatments reduce the visual bulk of the larger buitdings.

The CAS allowed for 192 keys to be constructed on the
site. The combination of this number of units in
configurations of 6 or tess is not considered a
reasonable or relevant requirement as it would result in
non-compliance with the Site Cover provisions outlined
in O9 of the Noosa Heads Locafity Code.

tt is noted that developments of a simitar scale recently
proposed in Noosa {ie. Settlers Cove and Noosa
Springs Resort) and have not been required to adhere

 

Page 5