06/0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published] · 132006.823

 

to this Probable Solution and have proposed more
traditional multiple unit accommodation blocks.

It is considered that the requirement for no more than 6
attached dwelling units relates more to the development
of multiple dwellings rather than visitor accommodation.

 

 

 

 

As can be seen the larger buildings comply with the provisions of Specific Outcome 044 of
the Noosa Heads Locality Code.

4. Please provide colour perspectives (1:200 on A3) of Blocks K, M & N, clearly detailing
proposed building materials and treatments intended to address Item 2 of this Information
Request.

4. Colour artist perspectives which clearly detail the proposed building materials and treatments
are included in Attachment 4. The first impression is taken from an upper area of Aima Way,
looking north towards Laguna Bay. Buildings | (N) and H (M) are visible. The second
impression is taken from between Building | (N) and Building V, looking back up towards the
southern corner of the site. The Central Facilities Building V and Building | (N) are visible in
the foreground, and Buildings H (M), D (E) & G (K) are visible in the background.

These perspectives clearly illustrate the considerable vertical and horizontal articulation and
significant balcony mixtures utilising lightweight building materials.

5. In order to ascertain the visual impact of the development when viewed from surrounding
areas please provide a colour impression of the resort buildings superimposed on the natural
background vegetation, when viewed from a cniical land viewing point such as main beach
being a selected location with the most visual impact as agreed by Council officers.

5. It was agreed with Neil Blamey to provide a montage from a point close to the Central
Groyne. Attachment 5 contains a photo (at that point) directed towards the subject site. Itis
noted by Chenoweth Environmental Planning (a visual amenity expert) that the proposed

development would not be visible from this viewing point. As such the production of a
montage has not been supplied.

Landscaping

6. Please provide details regarding the proposed methads to achieve 3-storey high planting
within Blocks K & N, taking into consideration the location of the basement car parking.

6. The applicant's landscape consultant has confirmed that a number of species nominated on
the Proposed Species List — Plant Schedule A, B & C contained within Edaw AECOM —
Landscape Development Report (pages 13 & 14) are able to be accommodated within 1
metre deep planter areas. An example of these species include:-

«  Archontophoenix cunninghamiana (Bangalow palm);
¢ Elaeocarpus Eumundii (Eumundi quandong);
¢ Harpullia pendula (Tulip wood);

« Macadamia integrifolia (Qld nut tree);

+ Macaranga tanarius (Macaranga);

Page 6