Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

Minor Change Attachment 3 Traffic Engineering Advice

of 12

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Table 10 Traffic Comparison – Revised Report Volumes & Currently Proposed Development Uses
                                          Saturday Noon                   Thursday PM
    Development Scenario
                                       Peak Hour Total Trips          Peak Hour Total Trips
     Revised Traffic Report
    Proposed Development                        599                           413
       (September 2019)
      Currently Proposed
       Development Uses                         453                           359
       (November 2019)
     Difference Total Trips                    -146                            -54

When compared to the traffic volumes previously assessed as part of the Revised Traffic Report, the
adopted uses are expected to generate considerably fewer vehicle trips than those adopted for the
previous SIDRA assessments. The currently Proposed Development configuration is not expected to
result in an increase in traffic to the site compared to the volumes identified in the Revised Traffic
Report (September 2019).

The findings of the SIDRA assessment are still therefore considered to be applicable (i.e. no external
works are required to support the proposed development).

Recommendation
Based on the above, we are of the opinion that there are no traffic engineering related matters to
preclude approval of the proposed development.

From a traffic perspective the updated proposed development is considered to represent a minor
change, as it is not expected to result in a significant increase in vehicle traffic to the site.

If you have any queries regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned on 07 3221 3503.


Yours faithfully,




Andrew Douglas
Director | Cambray Consulting Pty Ltd
BECivil (Hons) |MSc Env Man
FIEAust | CPEng | RPEQ 6691


Cambray Consulting has taken into account the particular instructions and requirements of Noosa Spotlight Property 2 Pty Ltd
and has taken care in the preparation of this report, however it neither accepts liability nor responsibility whatsoever in respect
of any use of this report by any third party, any third party whose interests may be affected by any decision made regarding the
contents of this report and / or any conclusion drawn resulting from omission or lack of full disclosure by Noosa Spotlight
Property 2 Pty Ltd, or their consultants.




\\FILE\Projects\BLU0517\01\3. Deliverables\2. Letters\2.MinorChange\MinorChange2019_20 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville.docx   Cambray Consulting Pty Ltd | Page 9
Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Attachment 3 Traffic Engineering Advice.pdf · 1.6 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.