Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

26.8.26 - Attachment 2 - Updated Architects Statement · MCU24/0074.01

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

    •   Perimeter walls to roof terraces are typically <1.2m in height.

    •   Stair 01 is a fire isolated stair and is required to service the roof, this also provides screening for a
        services zone. This roof over the stair is shown at 2500mm above roof terrace level, which is at the
        same height of RL 15.6 as the original DA plans.

    •   In relation to: “A privacy wall is permitted along the
        eastern side of the Roof Terrace 2 up to 1.7 metres in height” - A privacy wall between the roof
        terraces is shown as solid up to 1700, however as this will not provide privacy when entering and
        exiting the pool, a further screening element has been added to the top of this wall up to 2400
        above roof terrace level. Note this is also below the 15.6 RL on the original DA plans.

    •   Rooftop pool windows have been retained.

    •   Refer to item 5 above regarding the southern elevation.



Condition 9
The pergola structures have been reduced in height.


Condition 10

The maximum height of the development is RL 15.6 and 2500mm above roof terrace level, which is equal to
the height of RL 15.6 on the original DA plans.


Condition 12
All screens, materials and colours have been shown on the revised drawings.

Condition 13
Further detail of this area is provided in the revised drawings and has not resulted in an increase in GFA.
The “breezeways” are still open-air circulation corridors and remain unenclosed.

Condition 35 (d) & (e)
Condition requires amendment to suit the revised proposal car parking numbers which exceed these
requirements.

Condition 37 (d) & (e)
Condition requires amendment to suit the revised proposal car parking numbers.

Condition 38 & 39
Revised plans achieve the design intent of CD2.02 XR2 and Traffic Transport Plus Swept Path

Condition 40
Condition requires amendment to suit the revised proposal car parking numbers which have been
adjusted to suit the revised number of units. See item 4 above.




                                                       4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
75 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

26.8.26 - Attachment 2 - Updated Architects Statement.pdf · 75 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.