Council archive · source document
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES DATED 18 SEPTEMBER 2025 · 2025-09-18 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 18 SEPTEMBER 2025
7. DEPUTATIONS
7.1 APPLICANT: THOMAS DRAPER
TOPIC: DMP
SPEAKERS: THOMAS DRAPER & JASON BECKTON
8. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
8.1 ALAN DEERING
QUESTION 1
Noosa Council is guided by, and not dictated by the Austroads Standards and Guidelines,
also the Department of Main Roads Planning and Design Manual, so the Noosa Plan that
states when sealing dirt roads they must be no less than 9 metres is a Noosa Council initiative.
Does Noosa Council agree that any future sealing of dirt roads in the Noosa Shire will be to
a minimum width of 9 metres?
RESPONSE by Shaun Walsh, Director Infrastructure Services
Noosa Council is guided by, but not strictly bound to, professional standards like:
Austroads Standards and Guidelines;
Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) Planning and Design
Manual;
Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia (IPWEA) “Lower Order Road Design
Guidelines”.
These documents provide best-practice frameworks, but local governments like Noosa
Council have the autonomy to adopt higher or more tailored standards based on local
priorities, environmental considerations, and community expectations. You are correct that
the Noosa Plan (and associated infrastructure policies) specifies minimum carriageway and
shoulder widths for various road classifications for Noosa Shire. We can vary from these
specifications for a specific project requiring engineering justification to enable Council
support. Notably, the IPWEA “Lower Order Road Design Guidelines” updated recently in
2024, specifies a sealed carriage width of 5.5 metres when traffic volumes are low, and
provides a very good reference to inform any future detailed design for lower order unsealed
roads across Noosa Shire. Council can also consider this recently updated document in any
future review of the Noosa Plan and associated infrastructure policies. I also note that
following various representations from the community, Council has initiated a review of
Council's approach to management of unsealed roads, with broader consideration of
environmental, community benefit and traffic safety matters to more fully inform future
prioritisation and budget submissions for road sealing, of course subject to Council budget
approval.
QUESTION 2
Noosa Council employees such as Plant Operators are required to undergo a mandatory silica
test every 12 months. Noosa Council recognises the workplace risks of airborne dust but
totally ignores the health risks of airborne dust to ratepayers living on dirt roads. Why hasn't
Noosa Council addressed the dust issue of residents living on dirt roads in Noosa Shire by at
least adding dust suppressant in water trucks when annual resheeting of dirt roads?
RESPONSE by Shaun Walsh, Director Infrastructure Services
In terms of health risk, Council has undertaken a technical assessment of the potential health
risks associated with silica dust generated from unsealed gravel roads within the Noosa
Council region. It has evaluated the material composition, maintenance practices, and
environmental exposure context, referencing applicable standards and research findings.
Crystalline silica (SiO₂), primarily in the form of quartz, is a naturally occurring mineral found
in many geological materials including sand, clay, and gravel. Respirable crystalline silica
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES DATED 18 SEPTEMBER 2025 · 2025-09-18 Ordinary Meeting MinutesAttachmentsMeeting 909 · read item & discussion ↗
Meeting minutesMinutesMeeting 908 ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.