Original source · versioned page text
Development Application part 2 Report and Plans MCU13/0053
The original of this document is very large (117 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawncontinuity and pattern of consistent with S5.1. However, the
buildings and landscape location of the facility has been
elements within the street; and selected in an attempt to minimise
e) help protect the natural visual and amenity impacts, whilst
character and visual menity also avoiding the loss or
of the Noosa River system. fragmentation of productive rural
land. Therefore in this instance the
reduced boundary setbacks are
considered appropriate. These
setbacks are also compliant with
05 as the location will maintain the
visual amenity for those travelling
along the Lake Fl t Road and the
residential dwellirigs to the south
west.
The proposed facility is also
compliant with 05 as it is:
. well removed from community
sensitive locations, significant
areas of mature vegetation
exist on site and within the
surrounding area whiqh will
help to mitigate potential
visual impacts associated with
the development,
. is consistent with the visual
continuity of the surrounding
area as it has been co-located
with existing infrastructure
qses in the area (such as
power stanchions and light
poles)
. no landscaping or vegetation
removal is proposed as part
of this development and will
not impact on the Noosa
River system
Site cover No solution provided. 06~ Not Applicable.
06 The site cover of buildings The proposed facility is not a
and other roofed structures- building or roofed structure.
a) is of a .scale that is However, the development
compatible with surrounding footprint comprising an area of 80
development; m2 is relatively minor and
b)for a class 1 or cI.as$ 10a consistent with the scale of existing
structure with the Detached infrastructure in the surrounding
Housing Zone, does not area (e.g. power stanchions arid
exceed- light poles).
i. for a single storey
building -
50%; or The slimline monopole design (as
ii. for a building of 2 or opposed to a lattice type structure)
more storeys -
50% .
will reduce the visual dominance of
on the ground floor the structure when viewed from a
and 30% for the upper: distance including adjacent
storey(s), or 40% for properties, roads and other
all storeys for a surrounding areas. Additionally, the
building of 2 or more facility may be colour matched to
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.