Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach - Attachment D MCU13/0092
Very large file (23.1 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
.
Day: 43dBA
.
Evening: 40dBA
.
Night: 40dBA
7 NOISE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
7.1 Car Park Noise Criteria
Environmental Protection (Noise)Policy 2008 (EPP (Noise)2008)
Schedule 1 of the EPP (Noise) 2008 presents outdoor and indoor acoustical quality objectives
during the day, evening and night-time periods. These objectives apply to all forms of noise
experienced by a receptor.
The acoustical quality objectives for dwellings are reproduced in Table 3. It can be seen in this
table that the objectives are presented in terms of the adjusted LAeq, LAlO and LAO! noise levels
measured over a 1-hour time period.
Table 3: EPP (Noise)acoustic quality objectives
Acoustic Quality Objectives (dBA)
Sensitive Receptor Time of Day
LAeq, adj, thr L.uo, adj, 1h. LA01, adj, thr
Dwelling (for outdoors) Daytime and Evening 50 55 65
Daytime and Evening 35 40 45
Dwelling (for indoors)
Night-time 30 35 40
Transient Limits for Vehicle Noise Emissions
Even though EPP (Noise) 2008 has nominated noise criteria as presented in Table 3, they have
not been adopted in the assessment of transient noises due to the short duration of events such
as car park noise (including doors slamming, engines starting and vehicles manoeuvring on-site).
Comparing noise emissions from transient short duration events to limits imposed over an hour
long period can be misleading, due to the very short duration of the individual events7. In most
instances, an event will not impact upon the LA01,adJ,lhr or LAlO,adj,lhr parameters, while the LAeq,adj,lhr
parameter will not be significantly affected. As the transient events associated within the site are
expected to be intermittent, applying the acoustic quality objectives will not ensure amenity is
achieved for nearby residents.
7
Supporting this argument, the Explanatory Notes for the Environmental Protection (Noise)Policy 2008 state that "the
acoustic quality objectives are not individual point source emission standards but are total levels of noise in the
surrounding environment" and "meeting the objectives does not always mean that the environmental values are
protected"
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 11
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach - Attachment D MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 23.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.