Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach - Attachment D MCU13/0092
Very large file (23.1 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Statutory documents such as the Environmental Protection Act 1994 or the Environmental
Protection Regulation 2008 do not present any noise criteria for transient noise events. In the
absence of specific criteria, appropriate limits have been derived which take into account the
recommendations contained in the EPP 2008.
The aim of the EPP (Noise)2008 is to protect or enhance the qualities of the acoustic environment
that are conducive to:
. Protecting the health and biodiversity of ecosystems;
Human health and wellbeing, including by ensuring a suitable acoustic environment for
sleeping, studying / learning, and / or recreation (including relaxation and
conversation); and
. Protecting the amenity of the community.
In the case of transient noise such as those due to vehicle activities in the car park, the existing
amenity of the receptor would be protected if the noise associated with use of the car park is
to the normal ambient noise that would otherwise occur in the area. The
comparable
comparability should encompass features such as loudness, character, time of occurrence and
rate of occurrence.
Comparison of like parameters is a methodology that compares the characteristics of the noise
from the proposed development with the existing ambient noise at the site. This methodology
evaluates the receiving environment without the influence of the development using one or more
noise exposure parameters and compares this with the noise characteristics resulting from the
development. The chosen parameters must realistically reflect the character of the ambient noise
and the character of noise emitting from the development.
Using this approach, intruding noise is considered to be acceptable if it does not change the
character and level of the existing ambient noise environment by more than 3dBA, measured
using the relevant noise parameter(s). In other words, the overall noise contribution of the
proposed commercial development (or the commercial development component noise levels) at
the noise-sensitive receiver locations must not exceed the existing noise levels at these receiver
locations. This methodology complies with the environmental values to be enhanced or protected
under the EPP (Noise) 2008 and has been adopted by a number of Councils8.
For the very short duration events, the appropriate acoustic parameter to quantify such events
would be the adjusted average maximum noise level LAmax.adj’ These levels are compared against
the average LAmax noise levels during the daytime and evening-time periods, with the resulting
noise limits for transient noise as shown in Table 4.
Another key feature of the legislation is the need to ensure a suitable acoustic environment for
sleep, study and recreation. Of these, sleep preservation is generally considered to be the most
8
Brisbane City Council (NIAPSP)and Sunshine Coast Regional Council (Maroochy Plan 2000) are two examples.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc
5August 2013 Page 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach - Attachment D MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 23.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.