Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - State Code 6 Protection of state transport networks
Attached to the e-mail Reconfiguring a Lot (1 lot into 19) - RAL18/0023.
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks
Table 6.2.2: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Network impacts
PO1 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed development is consistent with the
the safety of a state-controlled road. Shire Business Centre (SBC) Map under the Noosa
Plan. Further, the external road network has been
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome, constructed to cater for the expected traffic generation
it is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of once the SBC is fully developed and operational. All
Queensland (RPEQ) certified road safety audit or road safety
assessment (as applicable) is provided. works have been undertaken in accordance with the
Infrastructure Agreement provided as Attachment 2.
Further information on determining whether a road safety audit or
road safety assessment is required is provided in section 9 of the
Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2017.
PO2 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed development including the internal and
the infrastructure condition of a state-controlled road external road network will not result in a worsening of
or road transport infrastructure. the infrastructure condition of any road transport
infrastructure.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome,
it is recommended that a RPEQ certified traffic impact assessment
and pavement impact assessment are provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact assessment
and pavement impact assessment is provided in the Guide to
Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2017.
PO3 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed development being consistent with the
operating conditions on a state-controlled road or the Noosa Plan will not result in a worsening of the
surrounding road network. operating conditions of road transport network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome,
it is recommended that an RPEQ certified traffic impact
assessment is provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 1 of 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 9 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO4 Development does not impose traffic loadings on AO4.1 The layout and design of the development The proposed development is consistent with the
a state-controlled road which could be directs traffic generated by the development to the SBC Map will not result on additional traffic loadings
accommodated on the local road network. local road network. local and State controlled road network.
PO5 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state- AO5.1 Upgrade works on a state-controlled road are All works required to be undertaken on the external
controlled road are built in accordance with relevant designed and constructed in accordance with the road network have been constructed in accordance
design standards. Road Planning and Design Manual, 2nd edition, with relevant standards consistent with the
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016. Infrastructure Agreement (Attachment 2).
PO6 Development involving the haulage of fill, AO6.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not N/A
extracted material or excavated spoil material transported to or from the development site on a
exceeding 10,000 tonnes per year does not damage state-controlled road.
the pavement of a state-controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a transport infrastructure impact
assessment and pavement impact assessment are provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO7 Development does not adversely impact on the AO7.1 Development does not require a new railway N/A
safety of a railway crossing. crossing.
Note: It is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be OR
prepared to demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome. An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian AO7.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated. N/A
Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be N/A
undertaken. Section 2.2 – Railway crossing safety of the Guide to OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this performance outcome. AO7.3 Upgrades to a level crossing are designed and
constructed in accordance with AS1742.7 – Manual of
uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings and applicable rail manager standard
drawings.
Note: It is recommended a traffic impact assessment be prepared
to demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome. An
impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level
Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be
undertaken. Section 2.2 – Railway crossing safety of the Guide to
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this acceptable outcome
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 2 of 10
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO7.4 Access points achieve sufficient clearance N/A
from a level crossing in accordance with AS1742.7 –
Manual of uniform traffic control devices, Part 7:
Railway crossings by providing a minimum clearance
of 5 metres from the edge running rail (outer rail) plus
the length of the largest vehicle anticipated on-site.
Note: Section 2.2 of the Guide to Development in a Transport
Environment: Rail, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015,
provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome.
AND
AO7.5 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to give N/A
priority to entering vehicles at all times.
PO8 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
the infrastructure condition of a railway or rail
transport infrastructure.
PO9 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
operating conditions of a railway
Stormwater and drainage
PO10 Development does not result in an actionable No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed stormwater drainage from the
nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater, flooding or development will be discharged from within the site
drainage impacts in a state transport corridor. and ultimately flowing to Eenie Creek without
impacting on a state transport corridor.
PO11 Run-off from the development site is not AO11.1 Development does not create any new Refer above
unlawfully discharged to a state transport corridor.
points of discharge to a state transport corridor.
AND
AO11.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a lawful Refer above
point of discharge.
Note: Section 3.49 of the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual,
Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia (Queensland
Division) Fourth Edition, 2016, provides further information on
lawful points of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 3 of 10
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO11.3 Development does not worsen the condition Refer above
of an existing lawful point of discharge to a state
transport corridor.
PO12 Run-off from the development site does not AO12.1 Run-off from the development site is not Refer above
cause siltation of stormwater infrastructure affecting a
discharged to stormwater infrastructure for a state
state transport corridor.
transport corridor.
Planned upgrades
PO13 Development does not impede delivery of AO13.1 Development is not located on land It is understood that no there are no planned
planned upgrades of state transport identified by the Department of Transport and Main upgrades of state transport infrastructure relevant to
infrastructure. Roads as land required for the planned upgrade of the development.
state transport infrastructure.
Note: Land required for the planned upgrade of state transport
infrastructure is identified in the DA mapping system.
OR
AO13.2 Development is sited and designed so that N/A
permanent buildings, structures, infrastructure,
services or utilities are not located on land identified
by the Department of Transport and Main Roads as
land required for the planned upgrade of state
transport infrastructure.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply: N/A
AO13.3 Structures and infrastructure located on
land identified by the Department of Transport and
Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of state transport infrastructure are able
to be readily relocated or removed without materially
affecting the viability or functionality of the
development.
AND
AO13.4 Vehicular access for the development is N/A
consistent with the function and design of the
planned upgrade of state transport infrastructure.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 4 of 10
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO13.5 Development does not involve filling and N/A
excavation of, or material changes to, land required
for a planned upgrade to a state transport
infrastructure.
AND
AO13.6 Land is able to be reinstated to the N/A
predevelopment condition at the completion of the
use.
Table 6.2.3: Public passenger transport infrastructure
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Public passenger transport infrastructure
PO14 Development does not damage or interfere AO14.1 Vehicular access and associated road The proposed development will not have any impact
with public passenger transport infrastructure, public access works are not located within 5 metres of upon the public transport infrastructure. The
passenger services or pedestrian or cycle access to public passenger transport infrastructure. completion of the internal loop road will ultimately
public passenger transport infrastructure and public improve traffic flow and public passenger services.
passenger services. AND
AO14.2 Development does not necessitate the Refer above
relocation of existing public passenger transport
infrastructure.
AND
AO14.3 Development does not obstruct pedestrian Refer above
or cyclist access to public passenger transport
infrastructure or public passenger services.
AND
AO14.4 The normal operation of public passenger Refer above
transport infrastructure or public passenger services
is not interrupted during construction of the
development.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 5 of 10
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response PO15 Upgraded or new public passenger No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed development will ultimately cater for transport infrastructure is provided to improved passenger transport infrastructure to cater accommodate the demand for public passenger for the demand at the Noosa Business Centre. transport generated by the development. Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome, it is recommended a public transport impact assessment be prepared in accordance with appendix 1 of the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting Information – Public Passenger Transport Infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017. New or upgraded public passenger transport infrastructure provided should be in accordance with the Public Transport Infrastructure Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015. Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public passenger transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the performance outcome. PO16 Development is designed to ensure the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Refer above location of public passenger transport infrastructure prioritises and enables efficient public passenger services. Note: Chapters 2 and 5 of the Public Transport Infrastructure Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015 provides guidance on how to comply with this performance outcome. Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public passenger transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the performance outcome. PO17 Development enables the provision or No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Refer above extension of public passenger services to the development and avoids creating indirect or inefficient routes for public passenger services. Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public passenger transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the performance outcome. State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4 State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 6 of 10
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO18 New or modified road networks are designed AO18.1 Roads catering for buses are arterial or The design of the internal lop road will cater public
to enable development to be serviced by public sub-arterial roads, collector or their equivalent. passenger services to the development in an efficient
passenger services. manner.
AND
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public AO18.2 Roads intended to accommodate buses are The design of the internal loop road will cater for
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the
designed and constructed in accordance with Road development that is to be serviced by public
performance outcome. Planning and Design Manual 2nd edition, Volume 3: passenger services.
Guide to Road Design, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2016.
Note: Guidance on how to meet the acceptable outcome is
available in the Road Planning and Design Manual 2nd edition,
Volume 3: Guide to Road Design, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2016:
1. Part 3:
a. 4.2 Traffic lanes
b. 4.8 Bicycle lanes
c. 4.9 High occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes
d. 4.12 Bus stops
e. 7 Horizontal alignment
f. 7.7 Super elevation
g. 7.9 Curve widening
2. Part 4:
a. 6.3 Bus Facilities
b. 5.6 Design vehicle swept path
3. Part 4A:
a. 5 Auxiliary lanes
4. Part 4B: Roundabouts:
a. 4 Geometric design
b. 4.6 Circulating carriageway.
AND
AO18.3 Traffic calming devices are not installed on Refer above
roads used for buses.
Note: Chapter 2 of the Public Transport Infrastructure Manual,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015 provides
guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 7 of 10
Page 8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO18.4 Where road humps are installed on roads Refer above
used for buses, the road humps are designed in
accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2018.
Note: Guidance on how to meet the acceptable outcome is
available in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part
13:
1. Section 2, clause 2.4, Road humps
2. Section 2, clause 2.1.2-1, Hump profiles for bus routes.
PO19 Development provides safe, direct and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed development will be designed to
convenient pedestrian access to existing and future provide safe, direct and convenient pedestrian access
public passenger transport infrastructure. to public transport infrastructure.
Note: Chapter 3 of the Public Transport Infrastructure Manual,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015 provides
guidance on how to comply with this performance outcome. In
particular, it is recommended that a pedestrian demand analysis
be provided to demonstrate compliance with the performance
outcome.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the
performance outcome.
PO20 On-site vehicular circulation ensures the AO20.1 The location of on-site pedestrian crossings The construction of the final stages of the internal
safety of both public passenger transport services ensures safe sight distances for pedestrians and loop road will provide for vehicular circulation for both
and pedestrians. public passenger services. public passenger transport services and for
pedestrians.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public passenger AND
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the performance
AO20.2 On-site circulation is designed and Refer above
outcome. constructed so that public passenger services can
enter and leave in a forward gear at all times.
AND
AO20.3 Development does not result in public Refer above
passenger services movements through car parking
aisles.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 8 of 10
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO21 Taxi facilities are provided to accommodate No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Adequate taxi facilities will be provided to
the demand generated by the development. accommodate the demand generated by the
development of the SBC.
Note: Guidance on how to meet the performance outcome are
available in chapter 7 of the Public Transport Infrastructure
Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the
performance outcome.
PO22 Taxi facilities are located and designed to AO22.1 A taxi facility is provided parallel to the Refer above
provide convenient, safe and equitable access for kerb and adjacent to the main entrance.
passengers.
AND
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public AO22.2 Taxi facilities are designed in accordance Taxi facilities will be designed to meet the required
passenger transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the
with: standards of design.
performance outcome.
1. AS2890.5–1993 Parking facilities – on-street
parking and AS1428.1–2009 Design for access
and mobility – general requirements for access –
new building work
2. AS1742.11–1999 Parking controls – manual of
uniform traffic control devices
3. AS/NZS 2890.6–2009 Parking facilities – offstreet
parking for people with disabilities
4. Disability standards for accessible public
transport 2002 made under section 31(1) of the
Disability Discrimination Act 1992
5. AS/NZS 1158.3.1 – Lighting for roads and public
spaces, Part 3.1: Pedestrian area (category P)
lighting – Performance and design requirements.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 9 of 10
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO23 Educational establishments are designed to AO23.1 Educational establishments are designed N/A
ensure the safe and efficient operation of public in accordance with the provisions of the Planning for
passenger services and pedestrian access. Safe Transport Infrastructure at Schools, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2011.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Information: Public passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2017, for further guidance on how to comply with the performance
outcome.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 10 of 10