Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - State Code 6 Protection of state transport networks
Attached to the e-mail Reconfiguring a Lot (1 lot into 19) - RAL18/0023.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO4 Development does not impose traffic loadings on AO4.1 The layout and design of the development The proposed development is consistent with the
a state-controlled road which could be directs traffic generated by the development to the SBC Map will not result on additional traffic loadings
accommodated on the local road network. local road network. local and State controlled road network.
PO5 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state- AO5.1 Upgrade works on a state-controlled road are All works required to be undertaken on the external
controlled road are built in accordance with relevant designed and constructed in accordance with the road network have been constructed in accordance
design standards. Road Planning and Design Manual, 2nd edition, with relevant standards consistent with the
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016. Infrastructure Agreement (Attachment 2).
PO6 Development involving the haulage of fill, AO6.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not N/A
extracted material or excavated spoil material transported to or from the development site on a
exceeding 10,000 tonnes per year does not damage state-controlled road.
the pavement of a state-controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a transport infrastructure impact
assessment and pavement impact assessment are provided.
Further information on how to prepare a traffic impact assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO7 Development does not adversely impact on the AO7.1 Development does not require a new railway N/A
safety of a railway crossing. crossing.
Note: It is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be OR
prepared to demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome. An impact on a level crossing may require an Australian AO7.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated. N/A
Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be N/A
undertaken. Section 2.2 – Railway crossing safety of the Guide to OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this performance outcome. AO7.3 Upgrades to a level crossing are designed and
constructed in accordance with AS1742.7 – Manual of
uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings and applicable rail manager standard
drawings.
Note: It is recommended a traffic impact assessment be prepared
to demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome. An
impact on a level crossing may require an Australian Level
Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be
undertaken. Section 2.2 – Railway crossing safety of the Guide to
Development in a Transport Environment: Rail, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2015, provides guidance on how to
comply with this acceptable outcome
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 6: Protection of state transport networks Page 2 of 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original