Council archive · source document
Appendix B - Arborist Report 22 August 2025 · OPW16/0303.02
Very large file (29.7 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 Arboricultural Impact Assessment and Visual Tree Assessment Prepared For: Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy Job Date: 22 August 2025 19 Trading Post Road Cooroy QLD 4563 IAS17818
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of pages 2 to 90 (of 98)
Page 2
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 Independent Arboricultural Services - Disclaimer The material contained in this document has been prepared on an independent basis free of any bias and represents the honest opinion of the consulting arborist. Tissue or soil samples have not been collected nor submitted for testing unless otherwise stated. Excavation is limited to minor earthworks and we submit this assessment on the basis that all data is based on visual inspection of the tree/s and its/their location, species, health and condition at the time of writing unless otherwise stated. Measurements and tree locations noted in this report are approximate and have not been determined by survey unless information and analysis has been provided by the consultant or such information is otherwise noted. Please request a more detailed arborist report if further information and analysis is required. Depending on site requirements, specific alternate specialist advice including engineering consultancy and certification maybe required in combination with this assessment. This assessment contains arborist advice and associated general information only and does not purport to provide other site-specific specialist advice such as engineering certification unless arrangement to source such advice for inclusion in this assessment has been requested and authorised. This report containing opinions, advice and recommendations based on information and data gathered from site inspections carried out by personnel from Independent Arboricultural Services as well as information provided by the client and/or its representatives, is to be relied on by the client in that context. It is assumed that all such information provided to Independent Arboricultural Services is correct. All recommended arboricultural works detailed in this assessment including pruning of tree canopy or roots, tree removal, tree transplantation or other associated works including stump grinding or the application of any prescribed treatment shall be carried out in accordance with applicable standards including Australian Standards AS 4373-2007 Pruning of amenity trees and AS 4970-2025 Protection of trees on development sites. This report is subject to copyright laws and no part of it may be reproduced or used without the express written permission of the client or Independent Arboricultural Services, nor shall it be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the written consent of the consultant and no responsibility will be accepted by Independent Arboricultural Services should such unauthorised use of this report be made. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements have been made including payment of additional fees for such services. The invoice for this report will be issued to the person or entity as per the address advised at the time of confirmation of appointment. Assessment in this report is based on plans provided at the time of confirmation of engagement and report preparation. Additional time required for re-assessment of report detail due to subsequent re-issue of plans after report preparation will be subject to an additional fee which will be charged at our hourly rate. This report shall not be conveyed to any third party including regulatory authority/s until full payment of this invoice is received by Independent Arboricultural Services and a finalised report has been issued unless agreement to do so has been granted. Factors including the absence of historical records or local knowledge, recognition of the variability of the integrity of a tree as a naturally living organism as well as the impact of conditions within its surrounds to which it maybe subject including the impacts of mechanical force and the occurrence of weather events, do not allow an arborist to guarantee the age of a tree, or the length of time a tree/s may live or such time as it /they may fail. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied that the problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. 1|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 3
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Executive Summary
Independent Arboricultural Services have been engaged by Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy (The Client) to
assess potential impacts to the nominated vegetation (Subject Trees) resulting from proposed swale
drain at 19 Trading Post Road, Cooroy QLD 4563. Additionally, a visual tree assessment of tree stock
located along the property boundary interface with TMR land was undertaken. Tom Kennedy (AQF Level
5) attended site on 22 August 2025 to undertake the assessment of the impact of the works.
The assessment of the impacts of proposed development on the identified trees in and around the
development envelope, roads and services has been undertaken. Advice on both specific and general tree
protection measures and Arborist Requirements have been detailed in this report. It is important as the
design is refined, further reviews are undertaken by the Project Arborist and protection measures are
further specified as required.
The Project scope is as follows;
“Palm Lake Works Pty Ltd seek the expertise of an AQF level 5 arborist to complete an Arboricultural
Impact Assessment of the trees along the western boundary of the resort.
The Impact Assessment should include the following:
• Assessment of tree species and health along the western boundary
• Delineation between Noosa Shire Council vs TMR Jurisdiction (based on existing survey plan)
• Recommendation for removal including timing of removal (i.e. altogether rather than periodically)
• Recommendation of replanting along boundary with consideration of the bund to be reshaped
along part of the boundary
• Provide comment on the TMR fire trail and recommendation to not plant trees within the fire trail
as discussed via teams.
• Inclusion of data plotting and photos where relevant.”
Site assessment was facilitated given the project brief. Survey pegs located on ground were identified
aiding field assessment of private and TMR land with a setback of 1.0m considered within the areas
between pegs for alignment consistency.
As part of the design process and operational works it is recommended that the following is
undertaken,
Tree Management Measures include,
• Ensure all approvals and permits are in place before works commence.
• Undertake a pre-start meeting with contractors before works commence.
• Tree Protection Fencing is to be erected before works commence and audited by the Project
Arborist (Min AQF Level 5).
• Tree removal is to be facilitated by a minimum AQF3 Arborist. Stumps are to be ground down
where accessible or treated with herbicide that is waterway registered by the APVMA.
• Supervision by a Project Arborist (Min AQF Level 5) and Fauna Spotter/Catcher of the approved
tree removals.
2|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 4
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
• Any works proposed within the TPZ of retained trees requires supervision of a minimum AQF
Level 5 Project Arborist.
• Any Tree Pruning is to be undertaken by a minimum AQF Level 3 Arborist.
• Laydown areas and site shed/office locations are to be identified/finalised and excluded from the
Tree Protection Zones of retained trees and minimise public impact.
• Route vehicles and equipment outside of TPZs. If access is required within TPZ,
mulch to a depth of 100mm and tree padding needs to be installed with the option of track
mats as determined and signed off by a minimum AQF5 Project Arborist.
• Construction materials, spoil, stockpiles, tools and equipment are not permitted within the TPZs
of retained trees.
3|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 5
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 Table of Contents Independent Arboricultural Services - Disclaimer ..................................................................... 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 Document Tracking & Information ............................................................................................ 5 Contact Details ........................................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. 6 Map ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 8 Tree Protection Guidelines ......................................................................................................... 9 Project Hold Points ..................................................................................................................... 9 Arborist Comments .................................................................................................................. 10 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 11 Tree Protection Plan ................................................................................................................. 12 Tree Locations .......................................................................................................................... 13 Tree Detail ................................................................................................................................ 20 Tree Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 35 Plans ......................................................................................................................................... 52 Photos....................................................................................................................................... 55 Appendix 1: Examples of Protection Measures ....................................................................... 89 Appendix 2: Tree Management Plan (TMP) – Works Progress: Development Phase ............. 90 Appendix 3: Tree Protection Signage ....................................................................................... 91 Appendix 4: Explanation of Terminology ................................................................................. 92 Appendix 5: Normal Function of a Tree ................................................................................... 94 Reference Page......................................................................................................................... 96 Company Details....................................................................................................................... 97 4|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 6
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Document Tracking & Information
Project Name Arboricultural Impact Assessment
Project Arborist Tom Kennedy (AQF Level 5)
Client Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy
Address 19 Trading Post Road, Cooroy QLD 4563
IAS Reference IAS17818
Prepared By Mick Maher (AQF Level 5)
Checked By Roger Rankine (AQF Level 8) Date Tuesday, 16 September
2025
Revision 1
• Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5) • TRAQ (Qualified)
Andrew Rankine • Arboriculture Australia Registered • ISA Certified Arborist & Municipal
Director Professional Arborist Specialist AU-0269AM
• QTRA (Qualified) • QAA Qualified Member
• Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5)
• QTRA (Qualified)
Roger Rankine • Grad Cert Arb. (AQF Level 8)
• TRAQ (Qualified)
Managing Director • ISA Board Certified Master Arborist
• QAA Qualified Member
(QL-001A)
• Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5) • Cert III Conservation and Land
Mick Maher • TRAQ (Qualified) Management
Business Manager • QTRA (Qualified) • Cert II Horticulture (Turf Management)
• Cert IV Project Management • QAA Qualified Member
• Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5) • TRAQ (Qualified)
Stephen Catchpoole • Doctor of Philosophy in Forestry • Bachelor of Science Forestry
Consulting Arborist (PhD) • Bachelor of Science (Hons Botany)
• QTRA (Qualified) • QAA Qualified Member
Sam Gilbey • Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5) • ISA Certified Arborist
Consulting Arborist • TRAQ (Qualified) • Bachelor of Science in Ecology and
• QTRA (Qualified) Conservation Biology
• QAA Qualified Member
• Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5)
• QTRA (Qualified)
Kieran Pentland • Grad Cert Arb. (AQF Level 8)
• TRAQ (Qualified)
Consulting Arborist • MSc. Arb. & Urban Forestry (AQF
• Bachelor of Arts in Leisure Management
Level 9)
• National Cert in Tree Management
• ISA Board Certified Master Arborist
• National Cert in Horticulture
Justin Darby • Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5)
• QTRA (Qualified)
Consulting Arborist • Certificate III Arboriculture
• Certificate II in ESI
• TRAQ (Qualified)
Tom Kennedy
Consulting Arborist • Certificate III Arboriculture • Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5)
Peter Sproule • Bachelor of Design (Landscape
CAD / GIS Drafting • Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5)
Architecture)
• VALID (Qualified)
Specialist • QAA Qualified Member
Robert Stoop
Trainee Consulting • Diploma Arb. (AQF Level 5) in
progress
Arborist
5|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 7
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Contact Details
Phone (07) 3399 5865
Enquiries [email protected]
Accounts [email protected]
Web www.independentarb.com.au
Postal Address PO Box 287, Morningside QLD 4170
ABN 65 062 099 495
Abbreviations
Australian Pesticides and Veterinary
NSC Noosa Shire Council APVMA
Medicines Authority
DA Development Application TPS Tree Protection Specifications
BAL Bushfire Attack Level CMP Construction Management Plan
BLE Building Location Envelope VMP Vegetation Management Plan
TPZ Tree Protection Zone AS Australian Standard
NRZ Notional Root Zone AS 4373: 2007 Pruning of amenity trees
Protection of trees on development
SRZ Structural Root Zone AS 4970: 2025
sites
RPA Root Protection Area DSH Diameter at Standard Height
PA Project Arborist CA Consulting Arborist
All comments and recommendations in this report have been determined in accordance with Australian
Standards AS 4373-2007 Pruning of amenity trees and AS 4970-2025 Protection of trees on
development sites. All recommended tree work should be carried out in accordance with these
standards.
Mick Maher
Consulting Arborist
6|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 8
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 Map Figure 1: Subject Site (Google Imagery® accessed 2025) 7|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 9
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 Introduction This report is based on a visual inspection carried out from the ground on 22 August 2025. No soil or tissue sampling has been conducted. Tree assessment and Qualitative Visual Tree Analysis has been carried out in accordance with TRAQ ISA guidelines. Data and information provided to the client by others has been incorporated into this report as appropriate. All Arboricultural recommendations contained in this report have been determined in accordance with Australian Standards AS 4373-2007 Pruning of amenity trees and AS 4970-2025 Protection of trees on development sites. For the purposes of this report reference to a Consulting or Project Arborist is held to mean an Arboricultural specialist who holds minimum Arboricultural qualifications of Dip Arb/AQF 5, appropriate professional insurances and has appropriate experience in the protection of trees on construction sites. Where tree work is specified, all recommended tree work is to be carried out in accordance with the above-mentioned standards by an appropriately trained and AQF qualified arborist practitioner/s with an up-to-date record of training and membership of a recognised Australian Arboricultural association, e.g. Qld Arboricultural Association (QAA), Arboriculture Australia (AA), or a recognised international Arboricultural association. No climbing spikes are to be used if pruning is to be carried out on live trees except in the instance of an emergency. Qualifications of the report authors include Diploma of Arboriculture/AQF Level 5 and ISA Certified Arborist accreditation. Report authors hold current insurances and memberships including qualified memberships of Queensland Arboricultural Association (QAA), and Arboriculture Australia (AA) as well as current accreditation and membership of International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Independent Arboricultural Services is a qualified registrant on the QAA Register of Consulting Arborists. 8|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 10
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree Protection Guidelines
• Protection of retained trees during construction works
Protection of Retained Trees During Construction Works
An exclusion zone is to be established along the perimeters of retained trees and cordoned off with a
physical barrier of wire mesh fence, 1.8m in height, which is securely anchored. The role of these fences
is to prevent any damage to the complete tree including root system (SRZ & TPZ/NRZ), stem and branch
structure as well as the crown or canopy. Alternatively, and on approval of a minimum AQF Level 5
Project Arborist, plastic mesh fencing, 1.2m in height, secured with star pickets and caps with straining
wire can be utilised. All TPZ fencing will require appropriate signage to signify the relevant protection
zones. This will require audit and sign off prior to operational works onsite.
Tree Protection Fencing to be utilised. Where works will be undertaken close to and within Tree
Protection Zones specific tree protection measures to be utilised a directed by the project Arborist.
Project Hold Points
Engage a minimum AQF Level 5 Project Arborist during the project life;
• Once tree protection fencing and signage has been established and finalised. Project Arborist
(minimum AQF Level 5) to audit and sign off.
• Any works within the NRZ of retained trees is required.
• If tree roots are encountered over 50mm in diameter outside of TPZs of retained trees.
• Changes to the plans occur.
• On completion of the project to conduct a final audit and summary.
(Site audits/summary reports will be conducted at each hold point interval by the Project Arborist)
Project Arborist Requirements
1. Pre-Start Inspection and Audit of Tree Protection Fencing Before Works Commence
2. Any required Tree Works to be undertaken by a minimum AQF Level 3 Arborist under the Supervision of the
Project Arborist (Min AQF Level 5). Tree Services Company to be a member of Queensland Arboricultural
Association or Arboriculture Australia.
3. All works within the NRZ of the retained vegetation to be supervised by the Project Arborist (Min AQF Level
5). Audit Reports to be completed and submitted by the Project Arborist. Any below ground incursion to be
water excavated under low pressure, under the supervision of the Project Arborist.
4. All works to be excluded from the Structural Root Zone (SRZ) and supervised if located within Tree Protection
Zone.
5. The Project Arborist to be consulted if changes to plans are made that affect any retained vegetation.
6. At the Completion of works, Project Arborist to undertake a site assessment and an audit report compile of
any further remedial actions required.
9|P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 11
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Arborist Comments
To facilitate swale installation to manage overland flows and site drainage a proposed drain is to be
installed with a 1.0m setback from the property boundary within TMR land. 25 trees have been
identified for removal with major incursion to facilitate installation. The subject trees identified for
removal are a mix of private and TMR assets. Ensure all approvals are in place prior to undertaking
removal. A 2.0m landscape buffer has been nominated from the existing fenceline as part of the design.
It is recommended any replacement species are not “like for like” replacements given the limited
growing environment, limited soil volume and profile, built environment and potential suppression,
phototropism, water logging, destabilisation and pest and disease. It is recommended to aid
stabilisation, a combination of native groundcovers, installed within pinned jute mat is undertaken.
Given the corridor alignment, it is not recommended mulch is used as part of the planting to ensure
waterway is not contaminated. Engage a suitable qualified landscape/natural regeneration company to
facilitate installation. Suitable replacement planting should consider the following species;
• Myoporum parvifolium
• Myoporum boninense
• Lomandra hystrix
• Lomandra longifolia
• Dianella caerulea
• Dianella brevipedunculata
• Scaevola albida
• Scaevola aemula
• Westringia spp.
• Ficinia nodosa
• Viola hederacea
• Grevillea spp.
Additionally, it is not recommended to replant within the TMR nominated land opposite the property
boundary with “like for like” species due to the pre-existing firebreak separating the remnant bushland
parcel and the property boundary. This exclusion should be maintained to allow sufficient access and
10 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 12
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
setback to mitigate fisk risk. Should there be any conjecture engage a bushfire expert to determine BAL
and subsequent risk.
Further visual tree assessment was undertaken along the resort boundary proper to assess tree species
based on health, form and risk. Select trees have been nominated for removal. Ensure relevant
authority approvals are in place prior to facilitating removal. Given the current vegetation densities
along the rear property boundary it is further recommended any offsets are undertaken with
groundcover, shrubs and understorey native endemic plantings only.
Conclusion
For all retained trees, with due care, implementation of appropriate work methodology as noted in this
report and isolation of all TPZs of retained trees from construction works, the potential for ill-effect to
retained/affected trees can be minimised in accordance with guidelines of AS4970:2025 – Protection of
trees on development sites.
The following must occur:
All required regulatory approvals must be in place prior to the commencement of any tree work for
future construction work. Approvals are required should the Project Arborist prescribe pruning such as
crown clean, canopy lift and/or directional pruning.
• Project Arborist must be appointed and engaged to guide the protection of protected trees from
project commencement, i.e. during Design Planning and during the construction period until its
completion.
• All Arboricultural reports, TPP, TPS, VMPs & approvals must be included in the CMP
• Exploratory low pressure water excavation is to be undertaken as specified.
• Arborist briefing of all engaged persons on their commencement as well as diligent work practice
must occur during all approved future construction work.
• Root disturbance must be minimised to prevent accidental injury, compression and the creation
of exposure points to allow future entry of pests and pathogens.
• All work within any TPZ must be supervised by the Project Arborist.
All work within TPZs must be carried out with due care to avoid mechanical impact with retained tree/s
during the construction phase. Sleeving should be installed to provide an impervious barrier between
exposed TPZ perimeter/s and new concreted areas to prevent chemical leeching into the surrounding
soil of retained trees.
Reactionary processes, such as the emergence of deadwood, dieback etc. are likely to occur as a result
of disturbance and/or injury to any retained tree on a construction site. Amended design plans and
construction methodology can serve to avoid or minimise the likely emergence of such issues and
therefore their associated future OH&S issues to the future occupants of the new dwellings and or
pedestrian or vehicular traffic within the vicinity of retained tree/s. Any required pruning is to be
undertaken by a minimum AQF Level 3 Arborist under the supervision of the Project Arborist (AQF Level
5).
11 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 13
PROJECT ARBORIST REQUIREMENTS
STORMWATER
1. Tree Protection Fencing and signage to be
214
OH
134 DESIGN
erected and audited by the Project Arborist
OH
145 116
204
205
FL RL 104.80
FL RL 103.52 before all works commence.
FL RL 104.71
100
OH
212
FL RL 104.84 140 2. All required pre-start meetings and regulatory
80
141
permissions to beTRADING
in place. POST ROAD
OH
60
OH > > > > 144
> > > FL RL 103.64 135 3. Plant Health Care COOROY
programQLD
to be4563
implement
>
40
OH
115
OH >
12 at the commencement and during civil works for
>
0
> trees with incursion within the TPZ as specified
OH
20
143
OH
> by the Project Arborist (AQF level 5).
>
FL RL 103.65
>
4. Project Arborist (AQF level 5) to supervise all
0.0
>
OH
>
PROPOSED BUND AS PER FOR trees.
>
works within the TPZ of retained
OH
OPW17-0055 B 14 UE
LA
142
-
5. Post works check and audit report to be
OH
0
FL RL 103.58
M
>
undertaken by the Project Arborist including a
O
OH
PALM LAKE WORKS
OH
NT
139 health form and risk assessment.
>
EXISTING TABLE DRAIN AS INSET A 137
S
FL RL 103.44 138 136 114 PTY LTD
OH
PER TMR16-018981 FL RL 103.18
RD
FL RL 103.32 113
OH
FL RL 102.99 FL RL 103.07
FL RL 103.47
>
16
0
REMEDIATE
Tree Protection Fencing
A
OH
>
EXISTING
-
A1
219.230
180
BUND ORIGINAL SIZE BEFORE REDUCTION
200
>
>
OH
> > > > >
OH
OH
ELM STREET
OH
B ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 02-04-25
A ORIGINAL ISSUE 20-02-25
OH
VER. DESCRIPTION DATE
OH
OH OH
OH OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH COPYRIGHT C
OH
OH OH OH OH OH
OH / / OH OH This drawing is copyright and the property of Burchills Engineering
OH
/ /
OH
/
Solutions. It must not be retained, copied or used without the
/ /
OH
/
OH / / / / OH OH OH
/
authority of Burchills Engineering Solutions.
/ /
OH OH
/ / / / OH OH OH
/ / /
OH
/ /
OH OH
/ / /
DISCLAIMER
/ / /
/ / /
OH
/ / /
OH
/ / / /
This drawing and its contents are electronically generated, are
/ /
OH / / / /
OH
/ / /
confidential and may only be used for the purpose for which they
/ /
OH
/ /
/
OH were intended.
OH
/
OH / Burchills Engineering Solutions will not accept responsibility for any
consequences arising from the use of the drawing for other than its
/
OH
/
/ intended purpose or where the drawing has been altered, amended or
changed either manually or electronically by any third party.
EXISTING TABLE DRAIN NOTE
AS PER TMR16-018981 This is an uncontrolled document issued for information purposes
It is recommended any replacement species are not “like for like” replacements given the limited
only, unless the checked sections are signed or completed.
Tree removal is to be it is not recommended to replant Figured dimensions take precedence over scale. Do not scale reduced
size drawings. Verify dimensions prior to commencing any on-site or
STORMWATER
growing LAYOUT PLANlimited soil volume and profile, built environment and potential
environment,
off-site works or fabrication.
facilitated by a minimum within the TMR nominated land 10 0 10 20 30 40 50
AQF3 Arborist. Stumps are to opposite the property boundary with SCALE
suppression,
1 : 1000 (FULL SIZE) phototropism, water logging, destabilisation and pest and disease. It is
(metres)
be ground down where “like for like” species due to the recommended to aid stabilisation, a combination of native groundcovers is utilised Engage a
accessible or treated with pre-existing firebreak separating the suitable qualified landscape/natural regeneration company to facilitate installation. Suitable GOLD COAST | BRISBANE | TOOWOOMBA
herbicide that is waterway remnant bushland parcel and the replacement planting should consider the following species; IPSWICH | MORETON BAY
PHONE: +61 7 5509 6400
FAX: +61 7 5509 6411
registered by the APVMA. property boundary. This exclusion EMAIL: [email protected]
•Myoporum
250mm MIN BUND TO BE EXISTING 2.1m ACOUSTIC FENCE COOTE BURCHILLS ENGINEERING PTY LTD
should be maintained toCONSTRUCTED
allow TO ENSURE parvifolium
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LOT ABN 76 166 942 365
CONTROL LINE 01
•Myoporum boninense
WATER IS FREE DRAINING AND BOUNDARY
Supervision by a Project sufficient access and setback
DIRECTED TOto
OVERLAND FLOW
LOT BOUNDARY
LOT BOUNDARY
LOT BOUNDARY
•Lomandra hystrix
PROJECT:
PATH BETWEEN LOT 137 & 136
Arborist (Min AQF Level 5) mitigate fisk risk. Should there be any
and Fauna Spotter/Catcher conjecture engage a bushfire expert
EXISTING SURFACE •Lomandra longifolia TRADING POST ROAD
•Dianella caerulea
ACOUSTIC
of the approved tree to determine BAL and subsequent FENCE COOROY
0.5m
Q100 @ 400mm Q100 @ 200mm
0.8m
ABOVE•Dianella
2.0m LANDSCAPE
LOT 144
brevipedunculata
1m
removals. ABOVE IL
risk. IL 1m
F.L. 103.64 PROPERTY BOUNDARY
BUFFER
1 IN
2 1 IN
2
TMR CORRIDOR
5.25m
•Scaevola 1 IN 4 albida
~0.8m
CONTROL LINE 01
•Scaevola aemula DRAWING TITLE :
1m
2m EMERGENCY
•Westringia
OVERLAND 2m LANDSCAPE
FLOW PATH BUFFER AS PER APPROVAL NO spp.
OPW 16/0303 > > > > > > >
STORMWATER
•Ficinia nodosa LAYOUT PLAN
HYDRAULIC MANNING'S CALCULATIONS HYDRAULIC •Viola
MANNING'S hederacea
CALCULATIONS INSET A
· MANNING'S CHANNEL FLOW EQUATION APPLIED, USING BELOW INPUTS · •Grevillea
MANNING'S spp.APPLIED, USING BELOW INPUTS
CHANNEL FLOW EQUATION
· CHANNEL LONGITUDINAL SLOPE = 1% 1.0 0 1.0 2.0
· CHANNEL LONGITUDINAL SLOPE = 1.38% SCALE (metres)
· CHANNEL MANNINGS 'N' = 0.015 DEVEL. APPLIC. No. : DATE : 02-04-25
· CHANNEL MANNINGS 'N' = 0.015 1 : 50 (FULL SIZE)
· CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION AS SHOWN ABOVE · CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION AS SHOWN ABOVE PROJECT LEADER : DEAN HARDWICK
· CALCULATED FLOW DEPTH = 400mm AT Q = 3.891 m3/s · CALCULATED FLOW DEPTH = 200mm AT Q = 0.225 m3/s
· FOR MINIUM 20% FREEBOARD, LET CHANNEL DEPTH = 400/0.8 = 500mm · FOR MINIUM 20% FREEBOARD, LET CHANNEL DEPTH = 200/0.8 = 250mm DESIGNER : TT
· THEREFORE, MAXIUM CAPACITY = 5.878 m3/s · THEREFORE, MAXIUM CAPACITY = 0.408 m3/s NOTES:
DRAFTSPERSON : TT
· CHANNEL % FREE BOARD = 25.00% · CHANNEL % FREE BOARD = 25.00%
· VELOCITY = 1.408 (m/s) 1. REFER DRG C400 FOR LEGEND CHECKED : MICHAEL HARVEY
· VELOCITY = 3.475 (m/s)
2. BUFFER PLANTING AS AGREED BY
COUNCIL AND LANDSCAPE CONSTRACTOR APPROVED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
BURCHILLS ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS ABN 76 166 942 365
SECTION A SECTION B
SCALE 1:50 - SCALE 1:50 - RPEQ No. : 26265
1.0 0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0 1.0 2.0 SCALE : AS NOTED DATUM : AHD FULL SIZE : A1
SCALE
1 : 50 (FULL SIZE)
(metres) SCALE
1 : 50 (FULL SIZE)
(metres)
FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT No.: DRAWING No. : VERSION:
BE220704 C401 B
Page 14
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 Tree Locations 13 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 15
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 14 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 16
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 15 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 17
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 16 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 18
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 17 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 19
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 18 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 20
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Please Note: Tree Locations have been assessed based on site survey pegs and 1.0m setback from boundary. Tree assessment has targeted specimens constituting
trees over 150mm in diameter. Colours signify tree ownership as presented in the Tree detail section of this report.
19 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 21
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree Detail
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
1 Stag Stag 29 2.0 3.48 8 2 Dead Dead - TMR
2 Stag Stag 25 1.8 3 8 2 Dead Dead - TMR
Melaleuca Common
3 23 1.8 2.76 7 4 Fair Typical TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark
Corymbia Pink
4 18 1.6 2.16 7 4 Fair Typical TMR
intermedia Bloodwood
5 Stag Stag 23 1.8 2.76 6 4 Dead Dead - TMR
6 Stag Stag 39 2.2 4.68 6 4 Dead Dead - TMR
Supressed,
Melaleuca Common
7 20 1.7 2.4 6 3 Fair Typical Deadwood under TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark
50mm
8 Stag Stag 20 1.7 2.4 6 3 Dead Dead - TMR
9 Stag Stag 32 2.1 3.84 10 2 Dead Dead - TMR
One sided,
Melaleuca Common
10 19 1.6 2.28 6 3 Fair Poor Deadwood under TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark
50mm
20 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 22
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
11 Stag Stag 19 1.6 2.28 6 3 Dead Dead - TMR
Melaleuca Common Deadwood under
12 21 1.7 2.52 6 3 Fair Typical TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark 50mm
Melaleuca Common Deadwood under
13 26 1.9 3.12 6 3 Fair Typical TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark 50mm
Melaleuca Common Deadwood under
14 26 1.9 3.12 6 3 Fair Typical TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark 50mm
One sided,
Melaleuca Common
15 31 2.0 3.72 6 3 Fair Poor Deadwood over PRIVATE
quinquenervia Paperbark
50mm
16 Stag Stag 60 2.7 7.2 12 5 Dead Dead - TMR
17 Stag Stag 39 2.2 4.68 12 5 Dead Dead - TMR
Melaleuca Common Deadwood under
18 57 2.6 6.84 9 7 Fair Typical TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
19 Swamp Box 38 2.2 4.56 10 6 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Melaleuca Common Deadwood under
20 29 2.0 3.48 8 4 Fair Typical PRIVATE
quinquenervia Paperbark 50mm
Lophostemon Queensland Deadwood under
21 19 1.6 2.28 10 4 Fair Typical PRIVATE
confertus Brush Box 50mm
21 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 23
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Lophostemon
22 Swamp Box 26.4 1.9 3.17 11 5 Fair Poor Deadwood over PRIVATE
suaveolens
50mm, Deadwood
under 50mm
Bifurcated,
Lophostemon Queensland Deadwood under
23 31 2.0 3.72 11 7 Fair Poor PRIVATE
confertus Brush Box 50mm, Previously
Lopped
Deadwood under
Lophostemon Queensland
24 15 1.5 2 7 3 Fair Poor 50mm, One sided, TMR
confertus Brush Box
Phototropic
Lophostemon Deadwood under
25 Swamp Box 33 2.1 3.96 11 7 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Queensland Deadwood under
26 17 1.6 2.04 8 4 Fair Typical TMR
confertus Brush Box 50mm
Broken Limbs,
Lophostemon
27 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 10 5 Poor Poor Deadwood over PRIVATE
suaveolens
50mm, Suppressed
28 Stag Stag 73.54 2.9 8.82 16 8 Dead Dead - PRIVATE
Cinnamomum Camphor Co-dominant Limbs,
29 47.97 2.4 5.76 7 7 Fair Poor TMR
camphora Laurel Weed species
Lophostemon Deadwood under
30 Swamp Box 23 1.8 2.76 11 6 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm, One sided
Lophostemon Deadwood under
31 Swamp Box 25 1.8 3 11 5 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm, One sided
22 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 24
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated,
Lophostemon
32 Swamp Box 18.6 1.6 2.23 9 7 Fair Poor Deadwood under TMR
suaveolens
50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
33 Swamp Box 25 1.8 3 12 6 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
34 Swamp Box 19 1.6 2.28 10 6 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
35 Swamp Box 31 2.0 3.72 12 7 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm, Vine growth
Bifurcated,
Lophostemon
36 Swamp Box 38.47 2.2 4.62 11 6 Fair Poor Deadwood under PRIVATE
suaveolens
50mm, Vine growth
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon dominant Limbs,
37 Swamp Box 26.83 1.9 3.22 11 7 Fair Poor PRIVATE
suaveolens Deadwood under
50mm, Suppressed
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon dominant Limbs,
38 Swamp Box 22.8 1.8 2.74 10 6 Fair Poor PRIVATE
suaveolens Deadwood under
50mm, Suppressed
Glochidion Deadwood under
39 Cheese Tree 18 1.6 2.16 9 6 Fair Typical TMR
ferdinandi 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
40 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 9 4 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm, Suppressed
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon dominant Limbs,
41 Swamp Box 23.02 1.8 2.76 10 5 Fair Poor PRIVATE
suaveolens Deadwood under
50mm
23 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 25
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Lophostemon
42 Swamp Box 21.47 1.7 2.58 7 5 Fair Poor Deadwood under PRIVATE
suaveolens
50mm, Previously
Lopped
Lophostemon Deadwood under
43 Swamp Box 17 1.6 2.04 10 4 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Cupaniopsis
44 Tuckeroo 19 1.6 2.28 5 6 Poor Typical Pest Infestation TMR
anacardioides
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon dominant Limbs,
45 Swamp Box 27.69 1.9 3.32 10 7 Fair Poor PRIVATE
suaveolens Deadwood under
50mm, Vine growth
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Acacia Hickory
46 18.03 1.6 2.16 4 6 Fair Poor Deadwood under PRIVATE
disparrima Wattle
50mm, Included
bark
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Lophostemon
47 Swamp Box 24.88 1.8 2.99 9 4 Poor Poor Deadwood under PRIVATE
suaveolens
50mm, Dieback,
Vine growth
Deadwood under
Lophostemon 50mm, Dieback,
48 Swamp Box 24 1.8 2.88 9 3 Poor Poor PRIVATE
suaveolens Included bark, Poor
crown density
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under
49 22 1.8 2.64 10 3 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm, Suppressed
24 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 26
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Deadwood under
Acacia Hickory
50 50.33 2.5 6.04 6 6 Fair Poor 50mm, Included TMR
disparrima Wattle
bark, Previously
Lopped, Reduced
vigour
Jagera Bifurcated, Co-
51 Foam Bark 30 2.0 3.6 7 6 Fair Poor TMR
pseudorhus dominant Limbs
Melaleuca Common Deadwood under
52 15 1.5 2 7 2 Fair Poor TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
53 Swamp Box 25 1.8 3 11 4 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
54 Swamp Box 26 1.9 3.12 11 5 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Queensland Deadwood under
55 16 1.5 2 10 3 Fair Typical TMR
confertus Brush Box 50mm
Xanthostemon Golden Bifurcated, Co-
56 35 2.1 4.2 6 5 Fair Poor TMR
chrysanthus Penda dominant Limbs
Bifurcated, Co-
Corymbia Pink dominant Limbs,
57 34.71 2.1 4.17 12 5 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood Deadwood under
50mm
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under
58 27 1.9 3.24 12 3 Fair Typical TMR
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm
25 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 27
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
Corymbia Pink dominant Limbs,
59 32.53 2.1 3.9 12 7 Fair Poor PRIVATE
intermedia Bloodwood Deadwood under
50mm
Bifurcated,
Corymbia Pink
60 22.83 1.8 2.74 12 5 Fair Poor Deadwood under TMR
intermedia Bloodwood
50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
61 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 8 2 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm, Suppressed
Acacia Hickory Deadwood under
62 39 2.2 4.68 12 8 Fair Typical TMR
disparrima Wattle 50mm
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under
63 35 2.1 4.2 12 5 Fair Typical TMR
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
Corymbia Pink dominant Limbs,
64 31.43 2.0 3.77 10 6 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood Deadwood under
50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
65 Swamp Box 16 1.5 2 6 3 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm, Suppressed
Lophostemon Deadwood under
66 Swamp Box 23 1.8 2.76 11 5 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
67 Swamp Box 18 1.6 2.16 11 3 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
68 Swamp Box 22 1.8 2.64 11 4 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm, One sided
26 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 28
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Lophostemon Deadwood under
69 Swamp Box 18 1.6 2.16 10 4 Fair Poor TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
70 Swamp Box 21 1.7 2.52 10 3 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Bifurcated,
Lophostemon
71 Swamp Box 22.36 1.8 2.68 10 4 Fair Poor Deadwood under TMR
suaveolens
50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
72 Swamp Box 34 2.1 4.08 10 5 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
73 Swamp Box 17 1.6 2.04 8 3 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm, Suppressed
Harpullia Deadwood under
74 Tulipwood 23 1.8 2.76 9 6 Fair Typical TMR
pendula 50mm
Harpullia Deadwood under
75 Tulipwood 21 1.7 2.52 9 6 Fair Typical TMR
pendula 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
76 Swamp Box 37.58 2.2 4.51 14 6 Fair Typical PRIVATE
suaveolens 50mm
Syzygium Deadwood under
77 Brush Cherry 16 1.5 2 6 3 Fair Typical TMR
australe 50mm
Deadwood under
Banksia
78 Coast Banksia 29 2.0 3.48 6 6 Fair Typical 50mm, Previously PRIVATE
integrifolia
Lopped
Banksia Deadwood under
79 Coast Banksia 31 2.0 3.72 6 6 Fair Typical PRIVATE
integrifolia 50mm
27 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 29
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Deadwood under
Cupaniopsis
80 Tuckeroo 15 1.5 2 4 4 Poor Typical 50mm, Pest TMR
anacardioides
Infestation
Syzygium Deadwood under
81 Brush Cherry 14.87 1.5 2 5 3 Fair Typical TMR
australe 50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
Xanthostemon Golden dominant Limbs,
82 15.62 1.5 2 6 3 Fair Typical PRIVATE
chrysanthus Penda Deadwood under
50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
83 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 8 2 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
Syzygium dominant Limbs,
84 Brush Cherry 21.42 1.7 2.57 6 3 Fair Typical TMR
australe Deadwood under
50mm
Syzygium Deadwood under
85 Brush Cherry 22 1.8 2.64 5 4 Fair Typical TMR
australe 50mm
Syzygium
86 Brush Cherry 20 1.7 2.4 2 2 Fair Poor Previously Lopped TMR
australe
Deadwood under
Glochidion
87 Cheese Tree 17.49 1.6 2.1 10 Poor Poor 50mm, Previously PRIVATE
ferdinandi
Lopped
Deadwood under
Cupaniopsis
88 Tuckeroo 18 1.6 2.16 5 4 Fair Poor 50mm, Poor crown TMR
anacardioides
density
Cupaniopsis Deadwood under
89 Tuckeroo 18 1.6 2.16 6 5 Fair Typical TMR
anacardioides 50mm
28 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 30
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Deadwood under
Melaleuca Common
90 15 1.5 2 7 3 Poor Typical 50mm, Poor crown TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark
density, Suppressed
Xanthostemon Golden Deadwood under
91 19.36 1.7 2.32 7 5 Fair Typical TMR
chrysanthus Penda 50mm
Bifurcated,
Xanthostemon Golden
92 23.37 1.8 2.8 7 6 Fair Typical Deadwood under TMR
chrysanthus Penda
50mm
Bifurcated,
Xanthostemon Golden
93 15.3 1.5 2 7 4 Fair Typical Deadwood under TMR
chrysanthus Penda
50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Acacia Deadwood under
94 Blackwood 24.29 1.8 2.91 7 7 Poor Poor PRIVATE
melanoxylon 50mm, Poor crown
density, Reduced
vigour
Xanthostemon Golden Deadwood under
95 17.29 1.6 2.07 6 4 Fair Typical TMR
chrysanthus Penda 50mm
Deadwood under
50mm, Pest
Cupaniopsis
96 Tuckeroo 17.8 1.6 2.14 7 6 Poor Typical Infestation, Poor TMR
anacardioides
crown density,
Reduced vigour
Deadwood under
97 Syzygium sp. Lilly Pilly 17 1.6 2.04 9 5 Fair Typical TMR
50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon Queensland dominant Limbs,
98 20.52 1.7 2.46 9 6 Fair Poor TMR
confertus Brush Box Deadwood under
50mm
29 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 31
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon Queensland dominant Limbs,
99 23.43 1.8 2.81 9 7 Fair Poor TMR
confertus Brush Box Deadwood under
50mm
Deadwood under
Acacia Hickory
100 34 2.1 4.08 10 9 Fair Typical 50mm, Reduced TMR
disparrima Wattle
vigour, Vine growth
Bifurcated, Co-
Corymbia Pink dominant Limbs,
101 26.42 1.9 3.17 8 8 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood Deadwood under
50mm, Suppressed
Bifurcated, Co-
Corymbia Pink dominant Limbs,
102 25.55 1.9 3.07 9 4 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood Deadwood under
50mm, One sided
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Deadwood over
Allocasuarina Black She-
103 20.9 1.7 2.51 8 6 Poor Poor 50mm, Deadwood TMR
littoralis oak
under 50mm, Decay,
Dieback, Poor crown
density
Acacia Deadwood under
104 Blackwood 19 1.6 2.28 9 5 Fair Typical PRIVATE
melanoxylon 50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
Corymbia Pink dominant Limbs,
105 27.75 1.9 3.33 10 6 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood Deadwood under
50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
106 Swamp Box 16.12 1.5 2 8 2 Fair Poor TMR
suaveolens 50mm, Suppressed
30 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 32
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon Queensland dominant Limbs,
107 41.15 2.3 4.94 9 6 Fair Poor PRIVATE
confertus Brush Box Deadwood under
50mm
Deadwood over
50mm, Deadwood
Allocasuarina Black She- Very under 50mm,
108 17 1.6 2.04 6 3 Poor TMR
littoralis oak Poor Dieback, Poor crown
density, Reduced
vigour
Acacia Deadwood under
109 Blackwood 28 1.9 3.36 6 8 Fair Typical PRIVATE
melanoxylon 50mm
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under
110 25 1.8 3 9 6 Fair Typical PRIVATE
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm
Acacia Deadwood under
111 Blackwood 16 1.5 2 5 5 Fair Poor PRIVATE
melanoxylon 50mm, Phototropic
Bifurcated,
Alphitonia Soap
112 17 1.6 2.04 7 3 Fair Poor Deadwood under TMR
excelsa Tree/Red Ash
50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
Corymbia Pink dominant Limbs,
113 33 2.1 3.96 9 6 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood Deadwood under
50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under TMR
114 33.24 2.1 3.99 10 5 Fair Poor
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm, Included
bark
31 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 33
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Corymbia Pink
115 26.4 1.9 3.17 8 3 Fair Poor Deadwood under TMR
intermedia Bloodwood
50mm, Included
bark, Suppressed
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under
116 23 1.8 2.76 10 3 Fair Typical TMR
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm
Lophostemon Queensland Deadwood under
117 33 2.1 3.96 9 8 Fair Typical PRIVATE
confertus Brush Box 50mm
Corymbia Pink Bifurcated, Co-
118 29.21 2.0 3.51 11 5 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood dominant Limbs
Lophostemon Deadwood under
119 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 8 3 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
Xanthostemon Golden dominant Limbs,
120 15.23 1.5 2 5 5 Fair Poor PRIVATE
chrysanthus Penda Deadwood under
50mm
Cupaniopsis Deadwood under
121 Tuckeroo 17 1.6 2.04 5 5 Fair Typical TMR
anacardioides 50mm
Lophostemon Deadwood under
122 Swamp Box 27 1.9 3.24 10 6 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Corymbia Pink
123 31.62 2.0 3.79 11 7 Fair Poor Deadwood under PRIVATE
intermedia Bloodwood
50mm
32 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 34
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Bifurcated, Co-
dominant Limbs,
Lophostemon Queensland
124 42.17 2.3 5.06 10 6 Fair Poor Deadwood over TMR
confertus Brush Box
50mm, Deadwood
under 50mm, Decay
Bifurcated, Co-
Lophostemon Queensland dominant Limbs,
125 39.2 2.2 4.7 9 7 Fair Poor TMR
confertus Brush Box Deadwood under
50mm
Deadwood under
50mm, Dieback,
126 Acacia leiocalyx Black wattle 23 1.8 2.76 9 8 Poor Typical TMR
Poor crown density,
Reduced vigour
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under
127 18 1.6 2.16 11 2 Fair Poor TMR
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm
Deadwood under
Acacia Hickory 50mm, Poor crown
128 26 1.9 3.12 9 9 Poor Poor TMR
disparrima Wattle density, Reduced
vigour
Melaleuca Common Deadwood under
129 16 1.5 2 8 3 Fair Typical TMR
quinquenervia Paperbark 50mm
Banksia Deadwood under
130 Coast Banksia 15 1.5 2 5 4 Fair Typical TMR
integrifolia 50mm
Deadwood under
Corymbia Pink
131 23.71 1.8 2.85 9 3 Fair Typical 50mm, Included TMR
intermedia Bloodwood
bark
Lophostemon Deadwood under
132 Swamp Box 16 1.5 2 8 2 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
33 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 35
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Asset
Tree Botanical Common DSH SRZ NRZ Height Spread
Health Form Observations Ownership
No. Name Name (cm) (cm) (m) (m) (m)
Private/TMR
Lophostemon Deadwood under
133 Swamp Box 21 1.7 2.52 9 5 Fair Typical TMR
suaveolens 50mm
Corymbia Pink Deadwood under
134 18 1.6 2.16 11 2 Fair Typical TMR
intermedia Bloodwood 50mm
Table Legend:
Health Form Aged Class Further Detail
Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) measured at 1.4m
Good: Trees foliage is in exceptional condition and Good: Trees structure is exceptional and can be above ground level. Diameter at Root Flare (DRF)
Juvenile: Tree will generally grow rapidly in this phase
can be considered an excellent specimen of its considered an excellent specimen of its species. No measured at the base of the tree, at the trunk / root
of its life cycle.
species. No pests or diseases are present. visible defects are present. system transition zone. Diameter = circumference
divided by π
Fair: Trees foliar condition is satisfactory but may be
Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) defined as metres radius.
exhibiting some signs of stress such as tip dieback or Typical: Trees structure is normal for the species; Mature: Tree has reached maturity and is producing
Calculated being DBH x 12 (minimum 2.0m and no
chlorosis, pests or diseases may be present but not some minor structural constraints may be present. flowers, fruits and seeds. Tree continues to grow.
greater than 15m).
adversely affecting the tree.
Poor: Foliage density is sparse or largely discoloured, Full to Late Maturity: Tree has reached the maximum
Structural Root Zone (SRZ) displaced as metres
tree health is at or approaching a critical value which Poor: Structure is a poor example of its species and height for its species, elongation has stopped but the
radius. Calculation being (DRF x 50)0.42 x 0.64 (never
may be irreversible, pests or diseases are highly exhibits a combination of structural issues. trunk continues to thicken, overall growth rate is
less than 1.5m or greater than 15m).
prevalent throughout the crown. starting to slow, foliar density may be starting to thin.
Senescent: Tree has / is starting to retract in size
TPZ / NRZ – unless otherwise specified the Tree
Dead: Tree is in advanced decline or completely Dead: Tree is in advanced decline or completely through dieback and shedding of limbs. Trees in this
Protection Zone and the Nominal Root Zone will be
dead. dead. age class may be ecologically valuable, as their
the same dimension.
structure contains habitat necessary for native fauna.
34 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 36
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree Recommendations
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
1 Stag Stag 29 2.0 1 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
2 Stag Stag 25 1.8 2 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
3 23 1.8 3 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Corymbia
4 Pink Bloodwood 18 1.6 4 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
intermedia
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
5 Stag Stag 23 1.8 5 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
6 Stag Stag 39 2.2 6 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
35 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 37
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
7 20 1.7 7 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
8 Stag Stag 20 1.7 8 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
9 Stag Stag 32 2.1 9 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
10 19 1.6 10 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
11 Stag Stag 19 1.6 11 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
12 21 1.7 12 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
13 26 1.9 13 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
36 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 38
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
14 26 1.9 14 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
15 31 2.0 15 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
16 Stag Stag 60 2.7 16 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
17 Stag Stag 39 2.2 17 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
18 57 2.6 18 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
19 Swamp Box 38 2.2 19 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
20 29 2.0 20 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
quinquenervia Paperbark
facilitate Swale construction.
37 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 39
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon Queensland
21 19 1.6 21 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
confertus Brush Box
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon
22 Swamp Box 26.4 1.9 22 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
suaveolens
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon Queensland
23 31 2.0 23 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
confertus Brush Box
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon Queensland
24 15 1.5 24 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
confertus Brush Box
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon
25 Swamp Box 33 2.1 25 MAJOR REMOVE • Specimen presents with incursion to
suaveolens
facilitate Swale construction.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon Queensland • Specimen presents with incursion to
26 17 1.6 2.04 MAJOR REMOVE
confertus Brush Box facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
27 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
38 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 40
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
• Specimen presents with incursion to
28 Stag Stag 73.54 2.9 8.82 MAJOR REMOVE
facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Cinnamomum • Specimen presents with incursion to
29 Camphor Laurel 47.97 2.4 5.76 MAJOR REMOVE
camphora facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
30 Swamp Box 23 1.8 2.76 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
31 Swamp Box 25 1.8 3 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
32 Swamp Box 18.6 1.6 2.23 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
33 Swamp Box 25 1.8 3 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
39 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 41
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
34 Swamp Box 19 1.6 2.28 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
35 Swamp Box 31 2.0 3.72 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
36 Swamp Box 38.47 2.2 4.62 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
37 Swamp Box 26.83 1.9 3.22 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
38 Swamp Box 22.8 1.8 2.74 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Glochidion • Specimen presents with incursion to
39 Cheese Tree 18 1.6 2.16 MAJOR REMOVE
ferdinandi facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
40 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 42
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
40 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
41 Swamp Box 23.02 1.8 2.76 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
42 Swamp Box 21.47 1.7 2.58 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
43 Swamp Box 17 1.6 2.04 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Cupaniopsis • Specimen presents with incursion to
44 Tuckeroo 19 1.6 2.28 MAJOR REMOVE
anacardioides facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
45 Swamp Box 27.69 1.9 3.32 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
41 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 43
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Acacia • Specimen presents with incursion to
46 Hickory Wattle 18.03 1.6 2.16 MAJOR REMOVE
disparrima facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
47 Swamp Box 24.88 1.8 2.99 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon • Specimen presents with incursion to
48 Swamp Box 24 1.8 2.88 MAJOR REMOVE
suaveolens facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Corymbia • Specimen presents with incursion to
49 Pink Bloodwood 22 1.8 2.64 MAJOR REMOVE
intermedia facilitate existing Swale restoration/
repairs.
Remove and Replace
Acacia • Specimen presents as previously
50 Hickory Wattle 50.33 2.5 6.04 N/A REMOVE
disparrima lopped with reduced vigour and
poor form.
Retain Protect and Monitor
Jagera
51 Foam Bark 30 2.0 3.6 N/A RETAIN • Install TPZ fencing to isolate from
pseudorhus
operational works activities.
42 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 44
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Melaleuca Common
52 15 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
quinquenervia Paperbark
Lophostemon
53 Swamp Box 25 1.8 3 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
54 Swamp Box 26 1.9 3.12 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon Queensland
55 16 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
confertus Brush Box
Xanthostemon
56 Golden Penda 35 2.1 4.2 N/A RETAIN Retain Protect and Monitor
chrysanthus
Corymbia
57 Pink Bloodwood 34.71 2.1 4.17 N/A RETAIN Retain Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Corymbia
58 Pink Bloodwood 27 1.9 3.24 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Corymbia
59 Pink Bloodwood 32.53 2.1 3.9 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Corymbia
60 Pink Bloodwood 22.83 1.8 2.74 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Lophostemon
61 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Acacia
62 Hickory Wattle 39 2.2 4.68 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
disparrima
43 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 45
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Corymbia
63 Pink Bloodwood 35 2.1 4.2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Corymbia
64 Pink Bloodwood 31.43 2.0 3.77 N/A RETAIN Retain Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Lophostemon
65 Swamp Box 16 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
66 Swamp Box 23 1.8 2.76 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
67 Swamp Box 18 1.6 2.16 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
68 Swamp Box 22 1.8 2.64 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
69 Swamp Box 18 1.6 2.16 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
70 Swamp Box 21 1.7 2.52 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
71 Swamp Box 22.36 1.8 2.68 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
72 Swamp Box 34 2.1 4.08 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
73 Swamp Box 17 1.6 2.04 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
44 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 46
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Harpullia
74 Tulipwood 23 1.8 2.76 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
pendula
Harpullia
75 Tulipwood 21 1.7 2.52 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
pendula
Lophostemon
76 Swamp Box 37.58 2.2 4.51 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Syzygium
77 Brush Cherry 16 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
australe
Banksia
78 Coast Banksia 29 2.0 3.48 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
integrifolia
Banksia
79 Coast Banksia 31 2.0 3.72 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
integrifolia
Remove and Replace
Cupaniopsis
80 Tuckeroo 15 1.5 2 N/A REMOVE
anacardioides • Specimen presents in poor health.
Syzygium
81 Brush Cherry 14.87 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
australe
Xanthostemon
82 Golden Penda 15.62 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
chrysanthus
Lophostemon
83 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Syzygium
84 Brush Cherry 21.42 1.7 2.57 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
australe
45 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 47
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Syzygium
85 Brush Cherry 22 1.8 2.64 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
australe
Remove and Replace
Syzygium
86 Brush Cherry 20 1.7 2.4 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents as previously
australe
lopped and poor form.
Remove and Replace
Glochidion
87 Cheese Tree 17.49 1.6 2.1 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents in poor health
ferdinandi
and form.
Remove and Replace
Cupaniopsis
88 Tuckeroo 18 1.6 2.16 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents with reduced
anacardioides
vigour and poor form.
Cupaniopsis
89 Tuckeroo 18 1.6 2.16 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
anacardioides
Remove and Replace
Melaleuca Common
90 15 1.5 2 N/A REMOVE
quinquenervia Paperbark • Specimen presents in poor health.
Xanthostemon
91 Golden Penda 19.36 1.7 2.32 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
chrysanthus
Xanthostemon
92 Golden Penda 23.37 1.8 2.8 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
chrysanthus
Xanthostemon
93 Golden Penda 15.3 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
chrysanthus
46 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 48
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Acacia
94 Blackwood 24.29 1.8 2.91 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents in poor health
melanoxylon
and form.
Xanthostemon
95 Golden Penda 17.29 1.6 2.07 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
chrysanthus
Remove and Replace
Cupaniopsis
96 Tuckeroo 17.8 1.6 2.14 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents in poor health
anacardioides
and form.
97 Syzygium sp. Lilly Pilly 17 1.6 2.04 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
Lophostemon Queensland
98 20.52 1.7 2.46 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
confertus Brush Box
Lophostemon Queensland
99 23.43 1.8 2.81 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
confertus Brush Box
Remove and Replace
Acacia
100 Hickory Wattle 34 2.1 4.08 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents with vine
disparrima
infestation and reduced vigour.
Corymbia
101 Pink Bloodwood 26.42 1.9 3.17 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Remove and Replace
Corymbia
102 Pink Bloodwood 25.55 1.9 3.07 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents as one sided and
intermedia
poor form.
47 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 49
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Allocasuarina
103 Black She-oak 20.9 1.7 2.51 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents in poor health
littoralis
and form.
Acacia
104 Blackwood 19 1.6 2.28 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
melanoxylon
Corymbia
105 Pink Bloodwood 27.75 1.9 3.33 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Lophostemon
106 Swamp Box 16.12 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
suaveolens
Lophostemon Queensland
107 41.15 2.3 4.94 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
confertus Brush Box
Remove and Replace
Allocasuarina
108 Black She-oak 17 1.6 2.04 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents in poor health
littoralis
and form.
Acacia
109 Blackwood 28 1.9 3.36 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
melanoxylon
Corymbia
110 Pink Bloodwood 25 1.8 3 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Acacia
111 Blackwood 16 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
melanoxylon
Alphitonia Soap Tree/Red
112 17 1.6 2.04 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
excelsa Ash
48 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 50
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Corymbia
113 Pink Bloodwood 33 2.1 3.96 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Corymbia
114 Pink Bloodwood 33.24 2.1 3.99 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Corymbia
115 Pink Bloodwood 26.4 1.9 3.17 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Corymbia
116 Pink Bloodwood 23 1.8 2.76 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Lophostemon Queensland
117 33 2.1 3.96 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
confertus Brush Box
Corymbia
118 Pink Bloodwood 29.21 2.0 3.51 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Lophostemon
119 Swamp Box 15 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Xanthostemon
120 Golden Penda 15.23 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
chrysanthus
Cupaniopsis
121 Tuckeroo 17 1.6 2.04 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
anacardioides
Lophostemon
122 Swamp Box 27 1.9 3.24 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Corymbia
123 Pink Bloodwood 31.62 2.0 3.79 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
49 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 51
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Remove and Replace
Lophostemon Queensland
124 42.17 2.3 5.06 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents with decay and
confertus Brush Box
poor form.
Lophostemon Queensland
125 39.2 2.2 4.7 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
confertus Brush Box
Remove and Replace
126 Acacia leiocalyx Black wattle 23 1.8 2.76 N/A REMOVE
• Specimen presents in poor health.
Corymbia
127 Pink Bloodwood 18 1.6 2.16 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
Remove and Replace
Acacia
128 Hickory Wattle 26 1.9 3.12 N/A REMOVE • Specimen presents in poor health
disparrima
and form.
Melaleuca Common
129 16 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
quinquenervia Paperbark
Banksia
130 Coast Banksia 15 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
integrifolia
Corymbia
131 Pink Bloodwood 23.71 1.8 2.85 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect and Monitor
intermedia
Lophostemon
132 Swamp Box 16 1.5 2 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
Lophostemon
133 Swamp Box 21 1.7 2.52 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
suaveolens
50 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 52
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree DSH SRZ NRZ Retention
Botanical Name Common Name Impact Recommendation
No. (cm) (m) (m) Status
Corymbia
134 Pink Bloodwood 18 1.6 2.16 N/A RETAIN Retain and Protect
intermedia
51 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 53
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 Plans 52 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 54
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 53 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 55
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025 54 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 56
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Photos
Tree 1 Tree 2
Tree 3 Tree 4
55 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 57
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 5 Tree 6
Tree 7 Tree 8
56 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 58
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 9 Tree 10
Tree 11 Tree 12
57 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 59
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 13 Tree 14
Tree 15 Tree 16
58 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 60
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 17 Tree 18
Tree 19 Tree 20
59 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 61
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 21 Tree 22
Tree 23 Tree 24
60 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 62
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 25 Tree 26
Tree 27 Tree 28
61 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 63
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 29 Tree 30
Tree 31 Tree 32
62 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 64
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 33 Tree 34
Tree 35 Tree 36
63 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 65
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 37 Tree 38
Tree 39 Tree 40
64 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 66
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 41 Tree 42
Tree 43 Tree 44
65 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 67
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 45 Tree 46
Tree 47 Tree 48
66 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 68
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 49 Tree 50
Tree 51 Tree 52
67 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 69
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 53 Tree 54
Tree 55 Tree 56
68 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 70
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 57 Tree 58
Tree 59 Tree 60
69 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 71
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 61 Tree 62
Tree 63 Tree 64
70 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 72
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 65 Tree 66
Tree 67 Tree 68
71 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 73
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 69 Tree 70
Tree 71 Tree 72
72 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 74
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 73 Tree 74
Tree 75 Tree 76
73 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 75
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 77 Tree 78
Tree 79 Tree 80
74 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 76
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 81 Tree 82
Tree 83 Tree 84
75 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 77
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 85 Tree 86
Tree 87 Tree 88
76 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 78
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 89 Tree 90
Tree 91 Tree 92
77 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 79
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 93 Tree 94
Tree 95 Tree 96
78 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 80
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 97 Tree 98
Tree 99 Tree 100
79 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 81
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 101 Tree 102
Tree 103 Tree 104
80 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 82
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 105 Tree 106
Tree 107 Tree 108
81 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 83
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 109 Tree 110
Tree 111 Tree 112
82 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 84
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 113 Tree 114
Tree 115 Tree 116
83 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 85
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 117 Tree 118
Tree 119 Tree 120
84 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 86
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 121 Tree 122
Tree 123 Tree 124
85 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 87
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 125 Tree 126
Tree 127 Tree 128
86 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 88
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 129 Tree 130
Tree 131 Tree 132
87 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 89
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Tree 133 Tree 134
88 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
Page 90
Arboricultural Impact Assessment - Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy - Revision 1 - IAS17818 - 22 August 2025
Appendix 1: Examples of Protection Measures
Examples Photos
The use low
pressure water
excavation for the
installation of
conduits
The use of black
plastic to line pier
holes
The use of black
plastic to line
concrete
The use of
Structural Soil.
Structural Soils –
(Source: Cornell
University)
89 | P a g e www.independentarb.com.au
The text continues on page 91.
Used in these records
Appendix B - Arborist Report 22 August 2025.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 29.7 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.