MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Maree Burgess

Code Objective                       Developer's     Assessment          Objectors'       Assessment

DRIVEWAYS & CAR PARKING CODE

01 Vehicular access does not         51.1- 51.3 Complies                 Does not Comply
adversely impact on safety,          Vehicle access is considered to     The Applicant fails to provide
capacity and operations         of   be compliant    with the relevant   objective evidence or verification          of
the existing or planned road         requirements.    The                the source of its "considered"           opinion
network, the proposed                development      will comply        that vehicle access is compliant.
driveway, cycleways or               where applicable.                   In the contrary, the proposed
pedestrian pathway systems.                                              Development's        vehicular access
                                                                         adversely impacts on safety of
                                                                         children using the pedestrian pathway
                                                                         to and from the School. The proposed
                                                                         Development         will significantly
                                                                         increase the amount of traffic using
                                                                         the access easement.
                                                                         The Applicant fails to consider or
                                                                         address how children will be able to
                                                                         safely cross the access way to the
                                                                         service station in a safe manner.

04 Vehicular access does not         54.1 Complies                       Does not Comply
adversely impact on the              The development      will comply    The current proposal will have a
capacity, operations      and        as required.                        significant adverse impact on the
maintenance       of the existing                                        operation       of the existing road
infrastructure;                                                          network in and around the School.

07 Sufficient carparking is          07 Complies                         Does not Comply
provided to accommodate              The proposed development            The qualification      "technically"     is an
the number and type of               will provide 10 car parking         obfuscation.      The proposed
vehicles likely to be                spaces. Technically this is         Development        does not comply with
generated by the                     below the minimum       according   the minimum        requirements        according
development       having regard      to Table 14-51 Vehicle Parking      to Table 14-51 Vehicle Parking
to the specifics of the use ...      Requirements.     However, it is    Requirements.
                                     considered that 10 spaces are
                                     suitable given the ancillary        It is the Applicant's     responsibility    to
                                     nature of the proposed petrol       design a compliant        solution in all
                                     building. The likely number of      respects, including provision of
                                     users of the service will be        required car parking spaces to comply
                                     there to refuel their vehicles,     with the planning scheme.
                                     which comprises leaving the         Council has determined          by way of the
                                     vehicle at the fuel dispenser.      planning scheme what is 'suitable'.
                                     The amount of users                 The Applicant provides no
                                     specifically using the site for     qualification,     expert opinion or
                                     the ancillary shop component        justification     to allow a conclusion that
                                     is considered to be low. It is      the amount proposed is "suitable."




                                                                                                                          21