Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Tables included in this Report only show results for the Total Sample. However, a comprehensive printout of all analyses has been closely examined in compiling the commentary. Average ratings for Importance and Performance were calculated - from which Weighted Performance Indicators were derived for each parameter being rated. These were then combined to provide a Weighted Performance Index for each of the five Themes of Council Responsibility and for Overall Performance on all 41 Areas as a whole. Reliability of the Findings The findings of the survey are obviously subject to Sampling Error. The maximum Probable Error of our total sample is ±3.1% at the 90% level of confidence. Comparisons between categories and subgroups are subject to varying error depending on respondent frequencies and the relative percentages of respondents falling in different response codes. This survey is not designed to deliver definitive findings for individual Council areas. By continuing to use the basic survey instrument and reporting methodology over an extended period of time, data accumulated in the form of ‘norms’ permit ever more accurate and reliable benchmarks to be established. Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017 MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.