Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Areas of Highest Performance Relative to Importance
There are 15 Responsibility Areas (out of the total of 41) on which Council performed
best in relation to their judged importance. In this case, ‘best’ is defined as having:
an Importance rating of at least 3.96 (on the border-line of ‘4’= ‘Important’), and
Performance more than 1.5% above Average (where Average Performance is
73.2% - the (calculated) Average Total Performance Index).
Responsibility Area Importance Performance Share of
Mean Rank Mean Rank Optimum
Libraries & Other 4.20 22 4.15 1 83.0%
Information Access
Waste Management 4.49 4 4.06 2 81.2%
Sporting & 3.98 28 3.94 3 78.8%
Recreational Facilities
Customer Service 4.37 9= 3.93 4= 78.6%
Quality & Performance 4.32 14= 3.93 4= 78.5%
of Outdoor Workers
Quality & Performance 4.32 14= 3.92 5= 78.4%
of Indoor Staff
Parks, Playgrounds & 4.23 20 3.92 5= 78.3%
Public Amenities
Disaster Management 4.45 5 3.91 6 78.3%
Development of 4.01 27 3.83 7 76.6%
Tourism
Community Safety 4.37 9= 3.81 8 76.1%
Managerial & 4.41 7 3.80 9 76.0%
Supervisory Officers
Information services 4.24 19 3.78 10 75.7%
Quality of Elected 4.60 1 3.75 11= 75.1%
Council
Environment 4.35 11 3.75 11= 74.9%
Protection &
Conservation
Financial Management 4.56 2 3.74 12 74.8%
*Responsibility Areas shown in shading were rated in ‘top ten’ in overall importance
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.