Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Areas of Average Performance
There are only 12 Responsibility Areas (out of the total of 41) on which Council has
received an average score which is defined as having;
an Importance rating of at least 3.96 (on the border-line of ‘4’= ‘Important’), and
Performance not more than 1.5% below or above Average (where Average
Performance 73.2% - the (calculated) Average Total Performance Index).
Responsibility Area Importance Performance Share of
Mean Rank Mean Rank Optimum
Environmental 4.33 13 3.71 13 74.3%
Controls
Building Control 4.39 8= 3.68 14= 73.7%
Community Services 4.29 17 3.68 14= 73.6%
Informing the 4.34 12 3.67 15 73.4%
Community
Revenue-raising 4.13 24 3.65 16 73.0%
Town Planning 4.39 8= 3.62 19= 72.5%
Community Health 4.31 15 3.62 19= 72.4%
Pet/Animal Control 4.07 26 3.62 19= 72.3%
Quality of Councillor(s) 4.42 6= 3.62 19= 72.3%
Dealt with
Human Resources 4.14 23 3.60 20= 71.9%
Management
Traffic Management 4.09 25 3.60 20= 71.9%
Drainage & Flood 4.30 16 3.59 21= 71.7%
Mitigation
*Responsibility Areas shown in shading were rated in ‘top ten’ in overall importance
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.