Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Managing the Shire
Weighted Performance Index (in order of Importance)
Theme 3 2017 Survey
Managing the Shire Importance Performance Performance
Means Means Indexes
Financial Management 4.6 3.7 74.8%
Disaster Management 4.5 3.9 78.3%
Building Control 4.4 3.7 73.7%
Town Planning 4.4 3.6 72.5%
Economic 4.4 3.2 63.9%
Development/Local
Employment
Human Resources 4.1 3.6 71.9%
Management
Revenue-raising 4.1 3.7 73.0%
Development of Tourism 4.0 3.8 76.6%
Means 4.34 3.63
Total Performance Index 72.62%
The weighted Total Performance Index (TPI) for Managing the Shire in 2017 is 72.62%
of the Optimum.
The table shows a comparison of how the community actually judges the performance
of council as it makes allowance for the relative Importance of each of the Activity
Areas judged. This ‘reality’ is shown in the Weighted Performance Indicator numbers.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 25
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.